Koenigsegg CCR
Car comparison
Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32VvsFerrari F50 GT 4.7 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari F50 GT
4.7 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V
- Fastest top speed395 km/h245 mph
- Most powerful806 hp601 kW
- Highest torque919 Nm678 lb-ft
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score96/100
- Best economy score61/100
Ferrari F50 GT 4.7 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.9 s
- Lightest860 kg1,896 lb
- Best power-to-weight872 hp/t650 kW/t1.1 kg/hp
- Best practicality score38/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 806hp601kW | 750hp559kW |
| Torque | 919Nm678lb-ft | 529Nm390lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,180kg2,601lb | 860kg1,896lb |
| Top speed | 395 km/h 245 mph | 376 km/h 234 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 46.5s99% target: 391 km/h / 243 mph Calculated | 39.5s99% target: 372 km/h / 231 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.2s | 2.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.5s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.1s Calculated | 2.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 25L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 10.3s Calculated | 9.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 683hp/t509kW/t310hp/1000 lb Calculated | 872hp/t650kW/t396hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 779Nm/t521lb-ft/ton Calculated | 615Nm/t412lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 471km292mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,719cc288cu in | 4,699cc287cu in |
| Length | 4,293mm169in | 4,578mm180in |
| Width | 1,996mm79in | 1,986mm78in |
| Height | 1,020mm40in | 1,092mm43in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,580mm102in |
| Front track | - | 1,620mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,594mm63in |
| Max trunk volume | 120L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Ferrari F50 GT 4.7 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 6,900 rpm | 5,700 rpm | 7,150 rpm |
| FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12 | 10,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm | 10,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.1 s | 2.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.2 s | 2.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.5 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 17.5 s | 17.1 s |
| Top speed | 395 km/h 245 mph | 376 km/h 234 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.8 s | 4.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 6.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.8 s | 8.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.3 s | 9.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 246 km/h 153 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 806 hp 601 kW |
| FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12 | 750 hp 559 kW |
Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V has 56 hp more than Ferrari F50 GT 4.7 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari F50 GT 4.7 V12 and Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V: 56 hp (42 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 919 Nm 678 lb-ft |
| FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12 | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 1,180 kg 2,601 lb |
| FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12 | 860 kg 1,896 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 395 km/h 245 mph |
| FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12 | 376 km/h 234 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 3.2 s |
| FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12 | 2.9 s |
Although Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V has more power, Ferrari F50 GT 4.7 V12 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari F50 GT 4.7 V12 and Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 683 hp/t 509 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp |
| FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12 | 872 hp/t 650 kW/t 1.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 806 hp 601 kW | 3.2 s | 395 km/h 245 mph |
| FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12 | 750 hp 559 kW | 2.9 s | 376 km/h 234 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 806 hp 601 kW | 750 hp 559 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 919 Nm 678 lb-ft | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.2 s | 2.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 395 km/h 245 mph | 376 km/h 234 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,180 kg 2,601 lb | 860 kg 1,896 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 471 km 292 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 683 hp/t 509 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | 872 hp/t 650 kW/t 1.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 17 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 47.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,550 L674 US gal561 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,463 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V
- Has 56 hp more
- Has 390 Nm more
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Ferrari F50 GT 4.7 V12
- Is 320 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 189 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























