Car comparison

Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32VvsFerrari Enzo 6.0 V12

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Koenigsegg CCR

4.7 i V8 32V

806 hp4719 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2004-2006
VS

Ferrari Enzo

6.0 V12

660 hp5998 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2001-2005

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    395 km/h
    245 mph
  • Most powerful
    806 hp
    601 kW
  • Highest torque
    919 Nm
    678 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,180 kg
    2,601 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    683 hp/t
    509 kW/t
    1.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    17.0 L/100 km
    13.8 mpg US
    16.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    25.0 L/100 km
    9.4 mpg US
    11.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    13.0 L/100 km
    18.1 mpg US
    21.7 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    77/100
  • Best performance score
    96/100
  • Best economy score
    61/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelKoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VFerrariEnzo6.0 V12
Power
806hp601kW
660hp492kW
Torque
919Nm678lb-ft
657Nm485lb-ft
Curb weight
1,180kg2,601lb
1,365kg3,009lb
Top speed
395 km/h
245 mph
350 km/h
217 mph
To 99% top speed
46.5s99% target: 391 km/h / 243 mph
Calculated
54.8s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.2s
3.7s
0-200 km/h
7.5s
Calculated
9.5s
0-60 mph
3.1s
Calculated
3.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
23L/100 km10.2mpg US12.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
25L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK
36L/100 km6.5mpg US7.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK
15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.3s
Calculated
11.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
683hp/t509kW/t310hp/1000 lb
Calculated
484hp/t361kW/t219hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
779Nm/t521lb-ft/ton
Calculated
481Nm/t322lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
471km292mi
Calculated
478km297mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,719cc288cu in
5,998cc366cu in
Length
4,293mm169in
4,702mm185in
Width
1,996mm79in
2,035mm80in
Height
1,020mm40in
1,147mm45in
Wheelbase
2,660mm105in
2,650mm104in
Front track-
1,660mm65in
Rear track-
1,650mm65in
Trunk volume-
350L
Max trunk volume
120L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
80L
110L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32VFerrari Enzo 6.0 V12PowerTorque
  • Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
  • Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V6,900 rpm5,700 rpm7,150 rpm
FerrariEnzo6.0 V127,800 rpm5,500 rpm8,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricKoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VFerrariEnzo6.0 V12
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.1 s
3.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.2 s
3.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
7.5 s
9.5 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
17.5 s
29.4 s
Top speed
395 km/h
245 mph
350 km/h
217 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
4.8 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.0 s
7.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.8 s
9.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.3 s
11.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
246 km/h
153 mph
220 km/h
137 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
806 hp
601 kW
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12
660 hp
492 kW

Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V has 146 hp more than Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12.

The biggest power difference is between Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12 and Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V: 146 hp (109 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
919 Nm
678 lb-ft
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12
657 Nm
485 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
1,180 kg
2,601 lb
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12
1,365 kg
3,009 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
395 km/h
245 mph
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12
350 km/h
217 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V3.2 s
FerrariEnzo6.0 V123.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V and Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
17.0 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.6 mpg UK
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12
23.0 L/100 km
10.2 mpg US
12.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V and Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12: 6.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
683 hp/t
509 kW/t
1.5 kg/hp
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12
484 hp/t
361 kW/t
2.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
471 km
292 mi
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12
478 km
297 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
806 hp
601 kW
3.2 s
395 km/h
245 mph
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12
660 hp
492 kW
3.7 s
350 km/h
217 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
Power
806 hp
601 kW
0-100 km/h3.2 s
Top speed
395 km/h
245 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Length
4,293 mm
169.0 in
Height
1,020 mm
40.2 in
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12
Power
660 hp
492 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
350 km/h
217 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,702 mm
185.1 in
Height
1,147 mm
45.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
Power
806 hp
601 kW
0-100 km/h3.2 s
Top speed
395 km/h
245 mph
17.0 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.6 mpg UK
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12
Power
660 hp
492 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
350 km/h
217 mph
23.0 L/100 km
10.2 mpg US
12.3 mpg UK

Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
17.0 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.6 mpg UK
3.2 s
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12
23.0 L/100 km
10.2 mpg US
12.3 mpg UK
3.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
683 hp/t
509 kW/t
1.5 kg/hp
17.0 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.6 mpg UK
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12
484 hp/t
361 kW/t
2.1 kg/hp
23.0 L/100 km
10.2 mpg US
12.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleKoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VFerrariEnzo6.0 V12
Power
806 hp
601 kW
660 hp
492 kW
Torque
919 Nm
678 lb-ft
657 Nm
485 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.2 s
3.7 s
Top speed
395 km/h
245 mph
350 km/h
217 mph
Lightness
1,180 kg
2,601 lb
1,365 kg
3,009 lb
Fuel consumption
17.0 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.6 mpg UK
23.0 L/100 km
10.2 mpg US
12.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Length
4,293 mm
169.0 in
Height
1,020 mm
40.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,702 mm
185.1 in
Height
1,147 mm
45.2 in
Range score
471 km
292 mi
478 km
297 mi
Trunk score
120 L
4.2 cu ft
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
683 hp/t
509 kW/t
1.5 kg/hp
484 hp/t
361 kW/t
2.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleKoenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32VFerrari Enzo 6.0 V12
Consumption17 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK23 L/100 km10.2 mpg US12.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km29.75 LC100 km40.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi47.88 LC100 mi64.78 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,550 L674 US gal561 UK gal3,450 L911 US gal759 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,463 LC/year6,038 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V

  • Has 146 hp more
  • Has 262 Nm more
  • Is 185 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 45 km/h (28 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 6.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 200 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12

  • Has 8 km (5 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 230 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V
Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.7 i V8 32V
4.7 i V8 32V
VS
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
6.0 V12
6.0 V12
VS
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12vsFerrari599 GTO6.0 V12
4.7 i V8 32V
5.0 V8
VS
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigseggCCGT5.0 V8
6.0 V12
6.0 V12
VS
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12vsFerrari599 GTB Fiorano6.0 V12
4.7 i V8 32V
4.8 V8
VS
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigseggCCX4.8 V8
4.7 i V8 32V
7.3 V12
VS
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsAston MartinOne-777.3 V12
6.0 V12
6.0 V12
VS
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12vsMaseratiMC126.0 V12
6.0 V12
575
VS
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12vsFerrari575M Maranello575
4.7 i V8 32V
6.3 V12
VS
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsFerrariLaFerrari6.3 V12
6.0 V12
3.9 V8
VS
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12vsFerrari488 GTB3.9 V8
4.7 i V8 32V
4.0 V8
VS
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsMcLarenSenna4.0 V8
6.0 V12
3.9 V8
VS
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12vsFerrari488 Spider3.9 V8
Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V vs Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12 - car comparison - FastVsFaster