Ferrari Enzo
Car comparison
Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12vsFerrari 575M Maranello 575
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari 575M Maranello
575
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed350 km/h217 mph
- Most powerful660 hp492 kW
- Highest torque657 Nm485 lb-ft
- Lightest1,365 kg3,009 lb
- Best power-to-weight484 hp/t361 kW/t2.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk350 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Ferrari 575M Maranello 575
- Lowest combined fuel consumption21.8 L/100 km10.8 mpg US13.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption34.5 L/100 km6.8 mpg US8.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range523 km325 mi
- Best economy score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | Ferrari575M Maranello575 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 660hp492kW | 515hp384kW |
| Torque | 657Nm485lb-ft | 588Nm434lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,365kg3,009lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.8s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph Calculated | 70.0s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.5s | 11.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 23L/100 km10.2mpg US12.3mpg UK | 21.8L/100 km10.8mpg US13.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 36L/100 km6.5mpg US7.8mpg UK | 34.5L/100 km6.8mpg US8.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.2s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 484hp/t361kW/t219hp/1000 lb Calculated | 298hp/t222kW/t135hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 481Nm/t322lb-ft/ton Calculated | 340Nm/t227lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 478km297mi Calculated | 523km325mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 5,748cc351cu in |
| Length | 4,702mm185in | 4,550mm179in |
| Width | 2,035mm80in | 1,935mm76in |
| Height | 1,147mm45in | 1,277mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,500mm98in |
| Front track | 1,660mm65in | 1,632mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,650mm65in | 1,586mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 350L | 185L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 110L | 114L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 499g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
- Ferrari 575M Maranello 575: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | 7,800 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 8,050 rpm |
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 7,250 rpm | 5,250 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | Ferrari575M Maranello575 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.5 s | 11.8 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 29.4 s | 47.6 s |
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.2 s | 12.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 220 km/h 137 mph | 202 km/h 125 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | 660 hp 492 kW |
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 515 hp 384 kW |
Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12 has 145 hp more than Ferrari 575M Maranello 575.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari 575M Maranello 575 and Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12: 145 hp (108 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | 657 Nm 485 lb-ft |
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 588 Nm 434 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb |
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | 3.7 s |
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12 and Ferrari 575M Maranello 575: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | 23.0 L/100 km 10.2 mpg US 12.3 mpg UK |
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 21.8 L/100 km 10.8 mpg US 13.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari 575M Maranello 575 and Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | 484 hp/t 361 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp |
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 298 hp/t 222 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | 478 km 297 mi |
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 523 km 325 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | 660 hp 492 kW | 3.7 s | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 515 hp 384 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 |
| 23.0 L/100 km 10.2 mpg US 12.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 |
| 21.8 L/100 km 10.8 mpg US 13.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari 575M Maranello 575 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | 23.0 L/100 km 10.2 mpg US 12.3 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 21.8 L/100 km 10.8 mpg US 13.0 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | 484 hp/t 361 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp | 23.0 L/100 km 10.2 mpg US 12.3 mpg UK |
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 298 hp/t 222 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 21.8 L/100 km 10.8 mpg US 13.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | Ferrari575M Maranello575 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 660 hp 492 kW | 515 hp 384 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 657 Nm 485 lb-ft | 588 Nm 434 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 23.0 L/100 km 10.2 mpg US 12.3 mpg UK | 21.8 L/100 km 10.8 mpg US 13.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 478 km 297 mi | 523 km 325 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 499 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 484 hp/t 361 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp | 298 hp/t 222 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12 | Ferrari 575M Maranello 575 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 23 L/100 km10.2 mpg US12.3 mpg UK | 21.8 L/100 km10.8 mpg US13 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 40.25 LC100 km | 38.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 64.78 LC100 mi | 61.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,450 L911 US gal759 UK gal | 3,270 L864 US gal719 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 6,038 LC/year | 5,723 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12
- Has 145 hp more
- Has 69 Nm more
- Is 365 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 186 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 165 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Ferrari 575M Maranello 575
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 45 km (28 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























