Car comparison

Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32VvsFerrari Enzo 6.0 V12

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Koenigsegg CC8S

4.7 i V8 32V

655 hp4700 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2002-2003
VS

Ferrari Enzo

6.0 V12

660 hp5998 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2001-2005

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    390 km/h
    242 mph
  • Highest torque
    750 Nm
    553 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,175 kg
    2,590 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    557 hp/t
    416 kW/t
    1.8 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    77/100
  • Best performance score
    96/100

Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12

  • Most powerful
    660 hp
    492 kW
  • Largest trunk
    350 L
  • Best economy score
    45/100
  • Best practicality score
    39/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelKoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32VFerrariEnzo6.0 V12
Power
655hp488kW
660hp492kW
Torque
750Nm553lb-ft
657Nm485lb-ft
Curb weight
1,175kg2,590lb
1,365kg3,009lb
Top speed
390 km/h
242 mph
350 km/h
217 mph
To 99% top speed
50.8s99% target: 386 km/h / 240 mph
Calculated
54.8s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.5s
3.7s
0-200 km/h
8.3s
Calculated
9.5s
0-60 mph
3.4s
Calculated
3.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
23L/100 km10.2mpg US12.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
36L/100 km6.5mpg US7.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.7s
Calculated
11.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
557hp/t416kW/t253hp/1000 lb
Calculated
484hp/t361kW/t219hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
638Nm/t427lb-ft/ton
Calculated
481Nm/t322lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
478km297mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,700cc287cu in
5,998cc366cu in
Length
4,190mm165in
4,702mm185in
Width
1,990mm78in
2,035mm80in
Height
1,070mm42in
1,147mm45in
Wheelbase
2,660mm105in
2,650mm104in
Front track-
1,660mm65in
Rear track-
1,650mm65in
Trunk volume-
350L
Max trunk volume
120L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
80L
110L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32VFerrari Enzo 6.0 V12PowerTorque
  • Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
  • Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V6,800 rpm5,000 rpm7,050 rpm
FerrariEnzo6.0 V127,800 rpm5,500 rpm8,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricKoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32VFerrariEnzo6.0 V12
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.4 s
3.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.5 s
3.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
8.3 s
9.5 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
19.7 s
29.4 s
Top speed
390 km/h
242 mph
350 km/h
217 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.0 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.3 s
7.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.2 s
9.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.7 s
11.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
237 km/h
147 mph
220 km/h
137 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
655 hp
488 kW
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12
660 hp
492 kW

Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12 has 5 hp more than Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V.

The biggest power difference is between Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V and Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12
657 Nm
485 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
1,175 kg
2,590 lb
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12
1,365 kg
3,009 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
390 km/h
242 mph
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12
350 km/h
217 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V3.5 s
FerrariEnzo6.0 V123.7 s

Although Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12 has more power, Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V and Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12: 0.1 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
557 hp/t
416 kW/t
1.8 kg/hp
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12
484 hp/t
361 kW/t
2.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
655 hp
488 kW
3.5 s
390 km/h
242 mph
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12
660 hp
492 kW
3.7 s
350 km/h
217 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
Power
655 hp
488 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
390 km/h
242 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Length
4,190 mm
165.0 in
Height
1,070 mm
42.1 in
FerrariEnzo6.0 V12
Power
660 hp
492 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
350 km/h
217 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,702 mm
185.1 in
Height
1,147 mm
45.2 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleKoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32VFerrariEnzo6.0 V12
Power
655 hp
488 kW
660 hp
492 kW
Torque
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
657 Nm
485 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.5 s
3.7 s
Top speed
390 km/h
242 mph
350 km/h
217 mph
Lightness
1,175 kg
2,590 lb
1,365 kg
3,009 lb
Fuel consumption
-
23.0 L/100 km
10.2 mpg US
12.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Length
4,190 mm
165.0 in
Height
1,070 mm
42.1 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,702 mm
185.1 in
Height
1,147 mm
45.2 in
Range score
-
478 km
297 mi
Trunk score
120 L
4.2 cu ft
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
557 hp/t
416 kW/t
1.8 kg/hp
484 hp/t
361 kW/t
2.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFerrari Enzo 6.0 V12
Consumption23 L/100 km10.2 mpg US12.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km40.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi64.78 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used3,450 L911 US gal759 UK gal
Annual fuel cost6,038 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V

  • Has 93 Nm more
  • Is 190 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 74 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 230 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V
Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V vs Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12 - car comparison - FastVsFaster