Koenigsegg CC8S
Car comparison
Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32VvsFerrari Enzo 6.0 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari Enzo
6.0 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Fastest top speed390 km/h242 mph
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Lightest1,175 kg2,590 lb
- Best power-to-weight557 hp/t416 kW/t1.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score96/100
Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12
- Most powerful660 hp492 kW
- Largest trunk350 L
- Best economy score45/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 655hp488kW | 660hp492kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 657Nm485lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,175kg2,590lb | 1,365kg3,009lb |
| Top speed | 390 km/h 242 mph | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 50.8s99% target: 386 km/h / 240 mph Calculated | 54.8s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.5s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.3s Calculated | 9.5s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.4s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 23L/100 km10.2mpg US12.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 36L/100 km6.5mpg US7.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.7s Calculated | 11.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 557hp/t416kW/t253hp/1000 lb Calculated | 484hp/t361kW/t219hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 638Nm/t427lb-ft/ton Calculated | 481Nm/t322lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 478km297mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,700cc287cu in | 5,998cc366cu in |
| Length | 4,190mm165in | 4,702mm185in |
| Width | 1,990mm78in | 2,035mm80in |
| Height | 1,070mm42in | 1,147mm45in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | - | 1,660mm65in |
| Rear track | - | 1,650mm65in |
| Trunk volume | - | 350L |
| Max trunk volume | 120L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 110L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 6,800 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | 7,800 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 8,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.4 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.5 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.3 s | 9.5 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 19.7 s | 29.4 s |
| Top speed | 390 km/h 242 mph | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.3 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.2 s | 9.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.7 s | 11.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 237 km/h 147 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 655 hp 488 kW |
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | 660 hp 492 kW |
Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12 has 5 hp more than Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V and Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | 657 Nm 485 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 1,175 kg 2,590 lb |
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 390 km/h 242 mph |
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | 350 km/h 217 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 3.5 s |
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | 3.7 s |
Although Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12 has more power, Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V and Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 557 hp/t 416 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp |
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | 484 hp/t 361 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 655 hp 488 kW | 3.5 s | 390 km/h 242 mph |
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | 660 hp 492 kW | 3.7 s | 350 km/h 217 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | FerrariEnzo6.0 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 655 hp 488 kW | 660 hp 492 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 657 Nm 485 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.5 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 390 km/h 242 mph | 350 km/h 217 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,175 kg 2,590 lb | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 23.0 L/100 km 10.2 mpg US 12.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 478 km 297 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 557 hp/t 416 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp | 484 hp/t 361 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 23 L/100 km10.2 mpg US12.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 40.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 64.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,450 L911 US gal759 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 6,038 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V
- Has 93 Nm more
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Has 74 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Ferrari Enzo 6.0 V12
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 230 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























