Koenigsegg CC8S
Car comparison
Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32VvsMercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199)
722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Fastest top speed390 km/h242 mph
- Most powerful655 hp488 kW
- Lightest1,175 kg2,590 lb
- Best power-to-weight557 hp/t416 kW/t1.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score96/100
- Best practicality score37/100
Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor
- Highest torque820 Nm605 lb-ft
- Largest trunk272 L
- Best economy score68/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 655hp488kW | 650hp485kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 820Nm605lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,175kg2,590lb | 1,649kg3,635lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,940kg4,277lb |
| Top speed | 390 km/h 242 mph | 337 km/h 209 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 50.8s99% target: 386 km/h / 240 mph Calculated | 62.4s99% target: 334 km/h / 207 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.5s | 3.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.3s Calculated | 10.2s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.4s Calculated | 3.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 20.9L/100 km11.3mpg US13.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.7s Calculated | 11.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 557hp/t416kW/t253hp/1000 lb Calculated | 394hp/t294kW/t179hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 638Nm/t427lb-ft/ton Calculated | 497Nm/t333lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 669km416mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,700cc287cu in | 5,439cc332cu in |
| Length | 4,190mm165in | 4,656mm183in |
| Width | 1,990mm78in | 1,908mm75in |
| Height | 1,070mm42in | 1,251mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | - | 1,638mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,569mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 272L |
| Max trunk volume | 120L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 97L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 6,800 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor | 6,500 rpm | 3,250-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.4 s | 3.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.5 s | 3.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.3 s | 10.2 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 19.7 s | 40.3 s |
| Top speed | 390 km/h 242 mph | 337 km/h 209 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.3 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.2 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.7 s | 11.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 237 km/h 147 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 655 hp 488 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor | 650 hp 485 kW |
Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V has 5 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor and Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor | 820 Nm 605 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 1,175 kg 2,590 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor | 1,649 kg 3,635 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 390 km/h 242 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor | 337 km/h 209 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 3.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor | 3.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V and Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 557 hp/t 416 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor | 394 hp/t 294 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 655 hp 488 kW | 3.5 s | 390 km/h 242 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor | 650 hp 485 kW | 3.6 s | 337 km/h 209 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 655 hp 488 kW | 650 hp 485 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 820 Nm 605 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.5 s | 3.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 390 km/h 242 mph | 337 km/h 209 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,175 kg 2,590 lb | 1,649 kg 3,635 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 669 km 416 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | 272 L 9.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 557 hp/t 416 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp | 394 hp/t 294 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,806 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 474 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 53 km/h (33 mph) higher top speed
- Has 163 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 152 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























