Volga K50
Car comparison
Volga K50 2.0TvsMini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Aceman (J05)
JCW 54.2 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volga K50 2.0T
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Largest trunk562 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
- Lightest1,750 kg3,858 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best performance score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolgaK502.0T | MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 238hp177kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,855kg4,090lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Gross weight | 2,265kg4,993lb | 2,355kg5,192lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 84.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 56.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.7s Calculated | 35.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 705km438mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | - |
| Length | 4,770mm188in | 4,079mm161in |
| Width | 1,895mm75in | 1,754mm69in |
| Height | 1,689mm66in | 1,514mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,845mm112in | 2,606mm103in |
| Front track | - | 1,519mm60in |
| Rear track | - | 1,515mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 210mm8in | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 562L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,532L | 1,005L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volga K50 2.0T: Power / Torque
- Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | 5,000 rpm | 50-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolgaK502.0T | MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 44.7 s | 35.9 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 238 hp 177 kW |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | 258 hp 192 kW |
Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh has 20 hp more than Volga K50 2.0T.
The biggest power difference is between Volga K50 2.0T and Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 8.2 s |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh and Volga K50 2.0T: 1.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 238 hp 177 kW | 8.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolgaK502.0T | MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 238 hp 177 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 705 km 438 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 562 L 19.8 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volga K50 2.0T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volga K50 2.0T
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 262 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Is 1.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























