Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023 GLB 250vsVolga K50 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolga K50
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,690 kg3,726 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Volga K50 2.0T
- Most powerful238 hp177 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | VolgaK502.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,855kg4,090lb |
| Gross weight | 2,265kg4,993lb | 2,265kg4,993lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.6s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 84.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.3s Calculated | 44.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 705km438mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,634mm182in | 4,770mm188in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,895mm75in |
| Height | 1,697mm67in | 1,689mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,829mm111in | 2,845mm112in |
| Front track | 1,604mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 210mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 565L | 562L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,800L | 1,532L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250: Power / Torque
- Volga K50 2.0T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 5,500-6,100 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| VolgaK502.0T | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | VolgaK502.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.3 s | 44.7 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 97 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 224 hp 167 kW |
| VolgaK502.0T | 238 hp 177 kW |
Volga K50 2.0T has 14 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250 and Volga K50 2.0T: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolgaK502.0T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
| VolgaK502.0T | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| VolgaK502.0T | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 7.0 s |
| VolgaK502.0T | 8.2 s |
Although Volga K50 2.0T has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250 and Volga K50 2.0T: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| VolgaK502.0T | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| VolgaK502.0T | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 714 km 444 mi |
| VolgaK502.0T | 705 km 438 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 224 hp 167 kW | 7.0 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| VolgaK502.0T | 238 hp 177 kW | 8.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolgaK502.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolgaK502.0T |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| VolgaK502.0T | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| VolgaK502.0T | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | VolgaK502.0T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 705 km 438 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | 562 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250 | Volga K50 2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250
- Is 165 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 km (6 mi) more estimated range
- Has 3 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volga K50 2.0T
- Has 14 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























