Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250vsMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023 GLB 250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023
GLB 250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful224 hp167 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score89/100
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 224hp167kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,690kg3,726lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,265kg4,993lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 78.5s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.2s Calculated | 28.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 642km399mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,410mm174in | 4,634mm182in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,611mm63in | 1,697mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,829mm111in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | 135mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 435L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,430L | 1,800L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 43L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 5,800 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 5,500-6,100 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.2 s | 28.3 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 224 hp 167 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 224 hp 167 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 6.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250 and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250 and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 642 km 399 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.9 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 224 hp 167 kW | 7.0 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 224 hp 167 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 642 km 399 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250 | Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250
- Is 225 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250
- Has 72 km (45 mi) more estimated range
- Has 130 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























