Car comparison

Cadillac GT4 28TvsVolga K50 2.0T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac GT4

28T

237 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present
VS

Volga K50

2.0T

238 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2026-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac GT4 28T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,760 kg
    3,880 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    135 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    813 km
    505 mi
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Volga K50 2.0T

  • Most powerful
    238 hp
    177 kW
  • Largest trunk
    562 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacGT428TVolgaK502.0T
Power
237hp177kW
238hp177kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,760kg3,880lb
1,855kg4,090lb
Gross weight-
2,265kg4,993lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
79.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
84.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
37.7s
Calculated
44.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
813km505mi
Calculated
705km438mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,633mm182in
4,770mm188in
Width
1,878mm74in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,535mm60in
1,689mm66in
Wheelbase
2,800mm110in
2,845mm112in
Front track
1,604mm63in
-
Rear track
1,607mm63in
-
Ground clearance
131mm5in
210mm8in
Trunk volume
289L
562L
Max trunk volume
1,190L
1,532L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
62L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac GT4 28TVolga K50 2.0TPowerTorque
  • Cadillac GT4 28T: Power / Torque
  • Volga K50 2.0T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacGT428T5,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm
VolgaK502.0T5,500 rpm1,800-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacGT428TVolgaK502.0T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.7 s
44.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
144 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacGT428T
237 hp
177 kW
VolgaK502.0T
238 hp
177 kW

Volga K50 2.0T has 1 hp more than Cadillac GT4 28T.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac GT4 28T and Volga K50 2.0T: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacGT428T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolgaK502.0T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacGT428T
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
VolgaK502.0T
1,855 kg
4,090 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacGT428T
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
VolgaK502.0T
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacGT428T7.8 s
VolgaK502.0T8.2 s

Although Volga K50 2.0T has more power, Cadillac GT4 28T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac GT4 28T and Volga K50 2.0T: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacGT428T
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
VolgaK502.0T
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac GT4 28T and Volga K50 2.0T: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacGT428T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
VolgaK502.0T
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacGT428T
813 km
505 mi
VolgaK502.0T
705 km
438 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacGT428T
237 hp
177 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
VolgaK502.0T
238 hp
177 kW
8.2 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacGT428T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
289 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,633 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
VolgaK502.0T
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
562 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,770 mm
187.8 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacGT428T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
VolgaK502.0T
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

Cadillac GT4 28T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacGT428T
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
7.8 s
VolgaK502.0T
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
8.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacGT428T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
VolgaK502.0T
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacGT428TVolgaK502.0T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
8.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
1,855 kg
4,090 lb
Fuel consumption
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
289 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,633 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
562 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,770 mm
187.8 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in
Range score
813 km
505 mi
705 km
438 mi
Trunk score
289 L
10.2 cu ft
562 L
19.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac GT4 28TVolga K50 2.0T
Consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.13 LC100 km15.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.12 LC100 mi24.78 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,969 LC/year2,310 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac GT4 28T

  • Is 95 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 109 km (68 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Volga K50 2.0T

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Has 273 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac GT4 28T
Volga K50 2.0T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cadillac GT4 28T vs Volga K50 2.0T - car comparison - FastVsFaster