Cadillac GT4
Car comparison
Cadillac GT4 28TvsVolga K50 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolga K50
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac GT4 28T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,760 kg3,880 lb
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t100 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range813 km505 mi
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score87/100
Volga K50 2.0T
- Most powerful238 hp177 kW
- Largest trunk562 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacGT428T | VolgaK502.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 237hp177kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,760kg3,880lb | 1,855kg4,090lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,265kg4,993lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 84.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.7s Calculated | 44.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 813km505mi Calculated | 705km438mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,633mm182in | 4,770mm188in |
| Width | 1,878mm74in | 1,895mm75in |
| Height | 1,535mm60in | 1,689mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,800mm110in | 2,845mm112in |
| Front track | 1,604mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,607mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 131mm5in | 210mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 289L | 562L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,190L | 1,532L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac GT4 28T: Power / Torque
- Volga K50 2.0T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolgaK502.0T | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacGT428T | VolgaK502.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.7 s | 44.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 237 hp 177 kW |
| VolgaK502.0T | 238 hp 177 kW |
Volga K50 2.0T has 1 hp more than Cadillac GT4 28T.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac GT4 28T and Volga K50 2.0T: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolgaK502.0T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
| VolgaK502.0T | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolgaK502.0T | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 7.8 s |
| VolgaK502.0T | 8.2 s |
Although Volga K50 2.0T has more power, Cadillac GT4 28T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac GT4 28T and Volga K50 2.0T: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| VolgaK502.0T | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac GT4 28T and Volga K50 2.0T: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| VolgaK502.0T | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 813 km 505 mi |
| VolgaK502.0T | 705 km 438 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 237 hp 177 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolgaK502.0T | 238 hp 177 kW | 8.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolgaK502.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolgaK502.0T |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac GT4 28T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| VolgaK502.0T | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| VolgaK502.0T | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacGT428T | VolgaK502.0T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 237 hp 177 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 813 km 505 mi | 705 km 438 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 289 L 10.2 cu ft | 562 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac GT4 28T | Volga K50 2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac GT4 28T
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 109 km (68 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volga K50 2.0T
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 273 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























