Car comparison

Cadillac GT4 28TvsAbarth 600e Turismo 54 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac GT4

28T

237 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Abarth 600e Turismo 54 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.2 s
  • Lightest
    1,625 kg
    3,583 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    146 hp/t
    109 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    360 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Cadillac GT4 28T

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    237 hp
    177 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacGT428TAbarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
Power
237hp177kW
237hp177kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
345Nm254lb-ft
Curb weight
1,760kg3,880lb
1,625kg3,583lb
Gross weight-
1,925kg4,244lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
79.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
55.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
6.2s
0-200 km/h
37.7s
Calculated
35.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
5.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
813km505mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
-
Length
4,633mm182in
4,187mm165in
Width
1,878mm74in
1,779mm70in
Height
1,535mm60in
1,557mm61in
Wheelbase
2,800mm110in
2,559mm101in
Front track
1,604mm63in
1,538mm61in
Rear track
1,607mm63in
1,520mm60in
Ground clearance
131mm5in
-
Trunk volume
289L
360L
Max trunk volume
1,190L
1,231L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacGT428TAbarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
5.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
6.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.7 s
35.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
14.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
157 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacGT428T
237 hp
177 kW
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
237 hp
177 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacGT428T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
345 Nm
254 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacGT428T
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
1,625 kg
3,583 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacGT428T
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacGT428T7.8 s
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh6.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth 600e Turismo 54 kWh and Cadillac GT4 28T: 1.6 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacGT428T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacGT428T
237 hp
177 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
237 hp
177 kW
6.2 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacGT428T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
289 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,633 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,187 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacGT428TAbarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
Power
237 hp
177 kW
237 hp
177 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
345 Nm
254 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
1,625 kg
3,583 lb
Fuel consumption
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
289 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,633 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,187 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Range score
813 km
505 mi
-
Trunk score
289 L
10.2 cu ft
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac GT4 28T
Consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac GT4 28T

  • Has 5 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Abarth 600e Turismo 54 kWh

  • Is 135 kg lighter
  • Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 71 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac GT4 28T
Abarth 600e Turismo 54 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

28T
EQE 300 98 kWh
VS
CadillacGT428TvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh
Turismo 54 kWh
1.3 T270
VS
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWhvsAbarthPulse1.3 T270
28T
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
CadillacGT428TvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
Turismo 54 kWh
JCW 54.2 kWh
VS
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWhvsMiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
28T
45 TFSI
VS
CadillacGT428TvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
28T
45 TDI V6
VS
CadillacGT428TvsAUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
28T
2.0i
VS
CadillacGT428TvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Turismo 54 kWh
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWhvsFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
28T
40 TFSI
VS
CadillacGT428TvsAUDIQ640 TFSI
Turismo 54 kWh
2.0 TSI
VS
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWhvsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
28T
650T
VS
CadillacGT428TvsChevroletBlazer650T
Turismo 54 kWh
GLB 250
VS
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250
Cadillac GT4 28T vs Abarth 600e Turismo 54 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster