Car comparison

Abarth 600e Turismo 54 kWhvsFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Abarth 600e

Turismo 54 kWh

237 hpElectricFWDAutomaticSUV2024-present

Ford Evos

2.0 EcoBoost

238 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Abarth 600e Turismo 54 kWh

Quickest 0-100 km/h
6.2 s
Fastest top speed
210 km/h
130 mph Unrestricted
200 km/h
124 mph Restricted
Lightest
1,625 kg
3,583 lb
Best power-to-weight
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Best performance score
55/100

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

Most powerful
238 hp
177 kW
Highest torque
376 Nm
277 lb-ft
Best overall score
65/100
Best economy score
87/100
Best practicality score
89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh	FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power	237hp177kW	238hp177kW
Torque	345Nm254lb-ft	376Nm277lb-ft
Curb weight	1,625kg3,583lb	1,655kg3,649lb
Gross weight	1,925kg4,244lb	2,065kg4,553lb
Top speed	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated	193 km/h 120 mph
To 99% top speed	56.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated	54.9s99% target: 191 km/h / 119 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	6.2s	6.6s
0-200 km/h	35.2s Calculated	-
0-60 mph	5.9s Calculated	6.2s Calculated
Fuel consumption	-	7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Quarter mile	14.4s Calculated	14.8s Calculated
Power-to-weight	146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated	144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated	227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	-	880km547mi Calculated
Displacement	-	1,999cc122cu in
Length	4,187mm165in	4,920mm194in
Width	1,779mm70in	1,920mm76in
Height	1,557mm61in	1,600mm63in
Wheelbase	2,559mm101in	2,945mm116in
Front track	1,538mm61in	1,628mm64in
Rear track	1,520mm60in	1,610mm63in
Ground clearance	-	168mm7in
Trunk volume	360L	-
Max trunk volume	1,231L	-
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	5
Fuel tank	-	66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh	FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	5.9 s	6.2 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	6.2 s	6.6 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	35.2 s	-
Top speed	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited	193 km/h 120 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.4 s	2.4 s
330 ft 101 m	6.2 s	6.3 s
1/8 mile 201 m	9.4 s	9.6 s
1000 ft 305 m	12.1 s	12.4 s
1/4 mile 402 m	14.4 s	14.8 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	157 km/h 97 mph	149 km/h 93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh	237 hp 177 kW
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost	238 hp 177 kW

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost has 1 hp more than Abarth 600e Turismo 54 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between Abarth 600e Turismo 54 kWh and Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh	345 Nm 254 lb-ft
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost	376 Nm 277 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh	1,625 kg 3,583 lb
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost	1,655 kg 3,649 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost	193 km/h 120 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh	6.2 s
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost	6.6 s

Although Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost has more power, Abarth 600e Turismo 54 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth 600e Turismo 54 kWh and Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.4 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh	146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost	144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh	237 hp 177 kW	6.2 s	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost	238 hp 177 kW	6.6 s	193 km/h 120 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh

Power	237 hp 177 kW
0-100 km/h	6.2 s
Top speed Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	360 L 12.7 cu ft
Length	4,187 mm 164.8 in
Height	1,557 mm 61.3 in

FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost

Power	238 hp 177 kW
0-100 km/h	6.6 s
Top speed 193 km/h 120 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	-
Length	4,920 mm 193.7 in
Height	1,600 mm 63.0 in

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh

FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost

Power

237 hp

177 kW

238 hp

177 kW

Torque

345 Nm

254 lb-ft

376 Nm

277 lb-ft

Acceleration

6.2 s

6.6 s

Top speed

Unrestricted

210 km/h130 mph

Restricted

200 km/h124 mph

193 km/h

120 mph

Lightness

1,625 kg

3,583 lb

1,655 kg

3,649 lb

Fuel consumption

7.5 L/100 km

31.4 mpg US

37.7 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	360 L 12.7 cu ft
Length	4,187 mm 164.8 in
Height	1,557 mm 61.3 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	-
Length	4,920 mm 193.7 in
Height	1,600 mm 63.0 in

Range score

880 km

547 mi

Trunk score

360 L

12.7 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

146 hp/t

109 kW/t

6.9 kg/hp

144 hp/t

107 kW/t

7.0 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption	7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	1,969 LC/year