Car comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 · Stage 3vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 · Stage 2vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 · Stage 1vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016

Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3)

900 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2019-2023
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016

Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2)

780 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2019-2023
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016

Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1)

708 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2019-2023
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016

Nismo 3.8 V6

600 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2019-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 900 hp

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    368 km/h
    229 mph
  • Most powerful
    900 hp
    671 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,011 Nm
    745 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,703 kg
    3,754 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    528 hp/t
    394 kW/t
    1.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    14.2 L/100 km
    16.6 mpg US
    19.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    19.3 L/100 km
    12.2 mpg US
    14.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    11.3 L/100 km
    20.8 mpg US
    25.0 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    521 km
    324 mi
  • Largest trunk
    249 L
  • Best overall score
    79/100
  • Best performance score
    95/100
  • Best economy score
    69/100
  • Best practicality score
    46/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3)900 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2)780 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1)708 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6600 hp
Power
900hp671kW+300 hp
780hp582kW+180 hp
708hp528kW+108 hp
600hp447kW
Torque
1,011Nm745lb-ft+359 Nm
880Nm649lb-ft+228 Nm
795Nm587lb-ft+143 Nm
652Nm481lb-ft
Curb weight
1,703kg3,754lb
1,703kg3,754lb
1,703kg3,754lb
1,703kg3,754lb
Gross weight
2,200kg4,850lb
2,200kg4,850lb
2,200kg4,850lb
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
368 km/h
229 mph
+53 km/h
353 km/h
219 mph
+38 km/h
344 km/h
214 mph
+29 km/h
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
31.3s99% target: 364 km/h / 226 mph-7.0 s
Calculated
32.7s99% target: 349 km/h / 217 mph-5.6 s
Calculated
35.5s99% target: 341 km/h / 212 mph-2.8 s
Calculated
38.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.2s-0.6 s
2.4s-0.4 s
2.5s-0.3 s
2.8s
0-200 km/h
5.4s-2.4 s
Calculated
6.0s-1.8 s
Calculated
6.5s-1.2 s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.1s-0.6 s
Calculated
2.3s-0.4 s
Calculated
2.4s-0.3 s
Calculated
2.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK
14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK
14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK
14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK
19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK
19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK
19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
8.9s-1.3 s
Calculated
9.3s-0.9 s
Calculated
9.6s-0.6 s
Calculated
10.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
528hp/t394kW/t240hp/1000 lb
Calculated
458hp/t342kW/t208hp/1000 lb
Calculated
416hp/t310kW/t189hp/1000 lb
Calculated
352hp/t263kW/t160hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
593Nm/t397lb-ft/ton
Calculated
517Nm/t346lb-ft/ton
Calculated
467Nm/t313lb-ft/ton
Calculated
383Nm/t256lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
521km324mi
Calculated
521km324mi
Calculated
521km324mi
Calculated
521km324mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,799cc232cu in
3,799cc232cu in
3,799cc232cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,690mm185in
4,690mm185in
4,690mm185in
4,690mm185in
Width
1,895mm75in
1,895mm75in
1,895mm75in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,370mm54in
1,370mm54in
1,370mm54in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
2,780mm109in
2,780mm109in
2,780mm109in
2,780mm109in
Front track
1,600mm63in
1,600mm63in
1,600mm63in
1,600mm63in
Rear track
1,600mm63in
1,600mm63in
1,600mm63in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance
105mm4in
105mm4in
105mm4in
105mm4in
Trunk volume
249L
249L
249L
249L
Doors
2
2
2
2
Seats
4
4
4
4
Fuel tank
74L
74L
74L
74L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 900 hpNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2) 780 hpNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1) 708 hpNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 600 hpPowerTorque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 900 hp: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2) 780 hp: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1) 708 hp: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 600 hp: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3)900 hp6,800 rpm3,600-5,600 rpm7,100 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2)780 hp6,800 rpm3,600-5,600 rpm7,100 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1)708 hp6,800 rpm3,600-5,600 rpm7,100 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6600 hp6,800 rpm3,600-5,600 rpm7,100 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3)900 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2)780 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1)708 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6600 hp
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.1 s
2.3 s
2.4 s
2.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.2 s
2.4 s
2.5 s
2.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
5.4 s
6.0 s
6.5 s
7.8 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
14.1 s
17.3 s
21.0 s
-
Top speed
368 km/h
229 mph
353 km/h
219 mph
344 km/h
214 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.6 s
1.7 s
1.7 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
4.0 s
4.2 s
4.3 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
5.9 s
6.2 s
6.4 s
6.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
7.6 s
7.9 s
8.1 s
8.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
8.9 s
9.3 s
9.6 s
10.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
268 km/h
167 mph
257 km/h
160 mph
248 km/h
154 mph
230 km/h
143 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3)900 hp
900 hp
671 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2)780 hp
780 hp
582 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1)708 hp
708 hp
528 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6600 hp
600 hp
447 kW

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 900 hp has 300 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 600 hp.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 600 hp and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 900 hp: 300 hp (224 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3)900 hp
1,011 Nm
745 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2)780 hp
880 Nm
649 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1)708 hp
795 Nm
587 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6600 hp
652 Nm
481 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3)900 hp
1,703 kg
3,754 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2)780 hp
1,703 kg
3,754 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1)708 hp
1,703 kg
3,754 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6600 hp
1,703 kg
3,754 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3)900 hp
368 km/h
229 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2)780 hp
353 km/h
219 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1)708 hp
344 km/h
214 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6600 hp
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3)900 hp2.2 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2)780 hp2.4 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1)708 hp2.5 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6600 hp2.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 900 hp and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 600 hp: 0.6 s.

The closest cars by acceleration are Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2) 780 hp and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1) 708 hp, separated by only 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3)900 hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2)780 hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1)708 hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6600 hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3)900 hp
528 hp/t
394 kW/t
1.9 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2)780 hp
458 hp/t
342 kW/t
2.2 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1)708 hp
416 hp/t
310 kW/t
2.4 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6600 hp
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3)900 hp
521 km
324 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2)780 hp
521 km
324 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1)708 hp
521 km
324 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6600 hp
521 km
324 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3)900 hp
900 hp
671 kW
2.2 s
368 km/h
229 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2)780 hp
780 hp
582 kW
2.4 s
353 km/h
219 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1)708 hp
708 hp
528 kW
2.5 s
344 km/h
214 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6600 hp
600 hp
447 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3)900 hp
Power
900 hp
671 kW
0-100 km/h2.2 s
Top speed
368 km/h
229 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2)780 hp
Power
780 hp
582 kW
0-100 km/h2.4 s
Top speed
353 km/h
219 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1)708 hp
Power
708 hp
528 kW
0-100 km/h2.5 s
Top speed
344 km/h
214 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6600 hp
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3)900 hp
Power
900 hp
671 kW
0-100 km/h2.2 s
Top speed
368 km/h
229 mph
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2)780 hp
Power
780 hp
582 kW
0-100 km/h2.4 s
Top speed
353 km/h
219 mph
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1)708 hp
Power
708 hp
528 kW
0-100 km/h2.5 s
Top speed
344 km/h
214 mph
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6600 hp
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 900 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3)900 hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
2.2 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2)780 hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
2.4 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1)708 hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
2.5 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6600 hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
2.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3)900 hp
528 hp/t
394 kW/t
1.9 kg/hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2)780 hp
458 hp/t
342 kW/t
2.2 kg/hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1)708 hp
416 hp/t
310 kW/t
2.4 kg/hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6600 hp
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3)900 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2)780 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1)708 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6600 hp
Power
900 hp
671 kW
780 hp
582 kW
708 hp
528 kW
600 hp
447 kW
Torque
1,011 Nm
745 lb-ft
880 Nm
649 lb-ft
795 Nm
587 lb-ft
652 Nm
481 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.2 s
2.4 s
2.5 s
2.8 s
Top speed
368 km/h
229 mph
353 km/h
219 mph
344 km/h
214 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,703 kg
3,754 lb
1,703 kg
3,754 lb
1,703 kg
3,754 lb
1,703 kg
3,754 lb
Fuel consumption
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
521 km
324 mi
521 km
324 mi
521 km
324 mi
521 km
324 mi
Trunk score
249 L
8.8 cu ft
249 L
8.8 cu ft
249 L
8.8 cu ft
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
528 hp/t
394 kW/t
1.9 kg/hp
458 hp/t
342 kW/t
2.2 kg/hp
416 hp/t
310 kW/t
2.4 kg/hp
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 900 hpNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 2) 780 hpNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 1) 708 hpNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 600 hp
Consumption14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km24.85 LC100 km24.85 LC100 km24.85 LC100 km24.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi39.99 LC100 mi39.99 LC100 mi39.99 LC100 mi39.99 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,728 LC/year3,728 LC/year3,728 LC/year3,728 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 900 hp

  • Has 120 hp more
  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 70 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Nissan GT-R (R35) Nismo 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected

Popular comparisons

Nismo 3.8 V6
Nismo 3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
Nismo 3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
Nismo 3.8 V6
Turbo 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsPorsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
Nismo 3.8 V6
4.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsMcLarenGT4.0 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
3.9 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsFerrariRoma3.9 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
R 4.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017R 4.0 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
63 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
3.0 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsMaseratiMC203.0 V6
Nismo 3.8 V6
4.4 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsBMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
CSL 3.0
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsBMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
Nismo 3.8 V6
3.8 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsMcLaren600LT3.8 V8
Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 · Stage 3 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 · Stage 2 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 · Stage 1 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster