Car comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6vsBMW M8 Coupe (F92) 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016

Nismo 3.8 V6

600 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2019-2023
VS

BMW M8 Coupe (F92)

4.4 V8

600 hp4395 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2019-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    315 km/h
    196 mph
  • Most powerful
    600 hp
    447 kW
  • Lightest
    1,703 kg
    3,754 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    352 hp/t
    263 kW/t
    2.8 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    78/100
  • Best performance score
    93/100

BMW M8 Coupe (F92) 4.4 V8

  • Highest torque
    750 Nm
    553 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.6 L/100 km
    22.2 mpg US
    26.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.2 L/100 km
    15.5 mpg US
    18.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    420 L
  • Best economy score
    78/100
  • Best practicality score
    52/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
Power
600hp447kW
600hp447kW
Torque
652Nm481lb-ft
750Nm553lb-ft
Curb weight
1,703kg3,754lb
1,885kg4,156lb
Gross weight
2,200kg4,850lb
2,385kg5,258lb
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
38.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
39.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.8s
3.3s
0-200 km/h
7.8s
Calculated
10.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.7s
Calculated
3.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK
15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.2s
Calculated
11.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
352hp/t263kW/t160hp/1000 lb
Calculated
318hp/t237kW/t144hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
383Nm/t256lb-ft/ton
Calculated
398Nm/t266lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
521km324mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
3,799cc232cu in
4,395cc268cu in
Length
4,690mm185in
4,867mm192in
Width
1,895mm75in
1,907mm75in
Height
1,370mm54in
1,362mm54in
Wheelbase
2,780mm109in
2,827mm111in
Front track
1,600mm63in
1,627mm64in
Rear track
1,600mm63in
1,632mm64in
Ground clearance
105mm4in
-
Trunk volume
249L
-
Max trunk volume-
420L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
74L
-
CO2 emissions-
242g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6BMW M8 Coupe (F92) 4.4 V8PowerTorque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
  • BMW M8 Coupe (F92) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V66,800 rpm3,600-5,600 rpm7,100 rpm
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V86,000 rpm1,800-5,600 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.7 s
3.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.8 s
3.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
7.8 s
10.9 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.8 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
4.5 s
4.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.7 s
7.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.6 s
9.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.2 s
11.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
230 km/h
143 mph
202 km/h
126 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
600 hp
447 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
652 Nm
481 lb-ft
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
750 Nm
553 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
1,703 kg
3,754 lb
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
1,885 kg
4,156 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62.8 s
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V83.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 and BMW M8 Coupe (F92) 4.4 V8: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M8 Coupe (F92) 4.4 V8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: 3.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
318 hp/t
237 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
600 hp
447 kW
3.3 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h3.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,867 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,362 mm
53.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h3.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

BMW M8 Coupe (F92) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
2.8 s
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
3.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
318 hp/t
237 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
Power
600 hp
447 kW
600 hp
447 kW
Torque
652 Nm
481 lb-ft
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.8 s
3.3 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,703 kg
3,754 lb
1,885 kg
4,156 lb
Fuel consumption
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,867 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,362 mm
53.6 in
Range score
521 km
324 mi
-
CO2 score
-
242 g/km
Trunk score
249 L
8.8 cu ft
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
318 hp/t
237 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6BMW M8 Coupe (F92) 4.4 V8
Consumption14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km24.85 LC100 km18.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi39.99 LC100 mi29.85 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,728 LC/year2,783 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6

  • Is 182 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

BMW M8 Coupe (F92) 4.4 V8

  • Has 98 Nm more
  • Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 171 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Nissan GT-R (R35) Nismo 3.8 V6
BMW M8 Coupe (F92) 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Nismo 3.8 V6
Nismo 3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8vsBMWM8 Gran Coupe (F93)4.4 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
4.4 V8
Competition 4.4 V8
VS
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8vsBMWM8 Gran Coupe (F93)Facelift 2022Competition 4.4 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
Turbo 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsPorsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
4.4 V8
Competition 4.4 V8
VS
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8vsBMWM8 Coupe (F92)Facelift 2022Competition 4.4 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
4.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsMcLarenGT4.0 V8
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8vsBMWM8 Convertible (F91)4.4 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
4.4 V8
Competition 4.4 V8
VS
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8vsBMWM8 Convertible (F91)Facelift 2022Competition 4.4 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
3.9 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsFerrariRoma3.9 V8
4.4 V8
M850i
VS
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8vsBMW8 Series (G15)M850i
Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 vs BMW M8 Coupe (F92) 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster