Car comparison

Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017

SVR 5.0 V8

575 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2019-2020
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016

Nismo 3.8 V6

600 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2019-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    322 km/h
    200 mph
  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,630 kg
    3,594 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    353 hp/t
    263 kW/t
    2.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.9 L/100 km
    21.6 mpg US
    25.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.4 L/100 km
    15.3 mpg US
    18.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    642 km
    399 mi
  • Largest trunk
    310 L
  • Best economy score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
575hp429kW
600hp447kW
Torque
700Nm516lb-ft
652Nm481lb-ft
Curb weight
1,630kg3,594lb
1,703kg3,754lb
Gross weight
2,150kg4,740lb
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
53.6s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph
Calculated
38.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.7s
2.8s
0-200 km/h
10.3s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.5s
Calculated
2.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK
19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.4s
Calculated
10.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
353hp/t263kW/t160hp/1000 lb
Calculated
352hp/t263kW/t160hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
429Nm/t287lb-ft/ton
Calculated
383Nm/t256lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
642km399mi
Calculated
521km324mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,000cc305cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,475mm176in
4,690mm185in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,311mm52in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
2,622mm103in
2,780mm109in
Front track
1,585mm62in
1,600mm63in
Rear track
1,611mm63in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance-
105mm4in
Trunk volume
310L
249L
Max trunk volume
408L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
70L
74L
CO2 emissions
249g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6PowerTorque
  • Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V86,500 rpm3,500-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V66,800 rpm3,600-5,600 rpm7,100 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.5 s
2.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.7 s
2.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.3 s
7.8 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
5.1 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.5 s
6.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.6 s
8.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.4 s
10.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
211 km/h
131 mph
230 km/h
143 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
575 hp
429 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 has 25 hp more than Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: 25 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
652 Nm
481 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
1,630 kg
3,594 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
1,703 kg
3,754 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
322 km/h
200 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V83.7 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: 3.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
353 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
642 km
399 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
521 km
324 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
575 hp
429 kW
3.7 s
322 km/h
200 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
310 L
10.9 cu ft
Length
4,475 mm
176.2 in
Height
1,311 mm
51.6 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
3.7 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
2.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
353 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
575 hp
429 kW
600 hp
447 kW
Torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
652 Nm
481 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.7 s
2.8 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,630 kg
3,594 lb
1,703 kg
3,754 lb
Fuel consumption
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
310 L
10.9 cu ft
Length
4,475 mm
176.2 in
Height
1,311 mm
51.6 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
642 km
399 mi
521 km
324 mi
CO2 score
249 g/km
-
Trunk score
310 L
10.9 cu ft
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
353 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6
Consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.08 LC100 km24.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.70 LC100 mi39.99 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,861 LC/year3,728 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8

  • Has 48 Nm more
  • Is 73 kg lighter
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 121 km (75 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 61 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6

  • Has 25 hp more
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8
Nissan GT-R (R35) Nismo 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

SVR 5.0 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
Nismo 3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
SVR 5.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
SVR 5.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
Turbo 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsPorsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
SVR 5.0 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
4.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsMcLarenGT4.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleSVR 5.0 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
3.9 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsFerrariRoma3.9 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
C 4.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
3.8 V6
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster