Car comparison

Ferrari Roma 3.9 V8vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ferrari Roma

3.9 V8

620 hp3855 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2020-present
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016

Nismo 3.8 V6

600 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2019-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ferrari Roma 3.9 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    335 km/h
    208 mph Unrestricted
    320 km/h
    199 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    620 hp
    462 kW
  • Highest torque
    760 Nm
    561 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,570 kg
    3,461 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    395 hp/t
    294 kW/t
    2.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.2 L/100 km
    21.0 mpg US
    25.2 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    272 L
  • Best overall score
    79/100
  • Best performance score
    94/100
  • Best economy score
    77/100
  • Best practicality score
    46/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFerrariRoma3.9 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
620hp462kW
600hp447kW
Torque
760Nm561lb-ft
652Nm481lb-ft
Curb weight
1,570kg3,461lb
1,703kg3,754lb
Gross weight-
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Calculated
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
52.7s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph
Calculated
38.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.4s
2.8s
0-200 km/h
9.3s
7.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.3s
Calculated
2.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.0s
Calculated
10.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
395hp/t294kW/t179hp/1000 lb
Calculated
352hp/t263kW/t160hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
484Nm/t324lb-ft/ton
Calculated
383Nm/t256lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
521km324mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,855cc235cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,656mm183in
4,690mm185in
Width
1,974mm78in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,301mm51in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,780mm109in
Front track
1,562mm61in
1,600mm63in
Rear track
1,679mm66in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance-
105mm4in
Trunk volume
272L
249L
Max trunk volume
345L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank-
74L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ferrari Roma 3.9 V8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6PowerTorque
  • Ferrari Roma 3.9 V8: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FerrariRoma3.9 V85,750-7,500 rpm3,000-5,750 rpm7,750 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V66,800 rpm3,600-5,600 rpm7,100 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFerrariRoma3.9 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.3 s
2.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.4 s
2.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.3 s
7.8 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
36.2 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Likely limited
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
4.9 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.3 s
6.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.3 s
8.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.0 s
10.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
219 km/h
136 mph
230 km/h
143 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariRoma3.9 V8
620 hp
462 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW

Ferrari Roma 3.9 V8 has 20 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 and Ferrari Roma 3.9 V8: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariRoma3.9 V8
760 Nm
561 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
652 Nm
481 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariRoma3.9 V8
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
1,703 kg
3,754 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariRoma3.9 V8
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariRoma3.9 V83.4 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62.8 s

Although Ferrari Roma 3.9 V8 has more power, Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 and Ferrari Roma 3.9 V8: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariRoma3.9 V8
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari Roma 3.9 V8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: 3.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariRoma3.9 V8
395 hp/t
294 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FerrariRoma3.9 V8
620 hp
462 kW
3.4 s
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FerrariRoma3.9 V8
Power
620 hp
462 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
272 L
9.6 cu ft
Length
4,656 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,301 mm
51.2 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FerrariRoma3.9 V8
Power
620 hp
462 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK

Ferrari Roma 3.9 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FerrariRoma3.9 V8
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
3.4 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
2.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FerrariRoma3.9 V8
395 hp/t
294 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFerrariRoma3.9 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
620 hp
462 kW
600 hp
447 kW
Torque
760 Nm
561 lb-ft
652 Nm
481 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.4 s
2.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
1,703 kg
3,754 lb
Fuel consumption
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
272 L
9.6 cu ft
Length
4,656 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,301 mm
51.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
-
521 km
324 mi
Trunk score
272 L
9.6 cu ft
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
395 hp/t
294 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFerrari Roma 3.9 V8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6
Consumption11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.60 LC100 km24.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi31.54 LC100 mi39.99 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,940 LC/year3,728 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ferrari Roma 3.9 V8

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 108 Nm more
  • Is 133 kg lighter
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 43 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 23 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ferrari Roma 3.9 V8
Nissan GT-R (R35) Nismo 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.9 V8
3.9 V8
VS
FerrariRoma3.9 V8vsFerrariRoma Spider3.9 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
Nismo 3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
3.9 V8
3.9 V8
VS
FerrariRoma3.9 V8vsFerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
3.9 V8
3.0 V6
VS
FerrariRoma3.9 V8vsFerrari296 GTS3.0 V6
Nismo 3.8 V6
Turbo 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsPorsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
3.9 V8
3.0 V6
VS
FerrariRoma3.9 V8vsFerrari296 GTB3.0 V6
Nismo 3.8 V6
4.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsMcLarenGT4.0 V8
3.9 V8
6.3 V12
VS
FerrariRoma3.9 V8vsFerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12
Nismo 3.8 V6
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
3.9 V8
3.9 V8
VS
FerrariRoma3.9 V8vsFerrari488 GTB3.9 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
R 4.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017R 4.0 V8
Ferrari Roma 3.9 V8 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster