Car comparison

Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche 911 (992)

Turbo 3.8

580 hp3745 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2020-2024
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016

Nismo 3.8 V6

600 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2019-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    330 km/h
    205 mph Unrestricted
    320 km/h
    199 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    750 Nm
    553 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,640 kg
    3,616 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    354 hp/t
    264 kW/t
    2.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.1 L/100 km
    21.2 mpg US
    25.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.3 L/100 km
    15.4 mpg US
    18.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.7 L/100 km
    27.0 mpg US
    32.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    604 km
    375 mi
  • Largest trunk
    264 L
  • Best overall score
    79/100
  • Best performance score
    94/100
  • Best economy score
    77/100
  • Best practicality score
    46/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
580hp433kW
600hp447kW
Torque
750Nm553lb-ft
652Nm481lb-ft
Curb weight
1,640kg3,616lb
1,703kg3,754lb
Gross weight
2,040kg4,497lb
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Calculated
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
78.8s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph
Calculated
38.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.8s
2.8s
0-200 km/h
9.7s
7.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.7s
Calculated
2.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK
19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.7s
Calculated
10.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
354hp/t264kW/t160hp/1000 lb
Calculated
352hp/t263kW/t160hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
457Nm/t306lb-ft/ton
Calculated
383Nm/t256lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
604km375mi
Calculated
521km324mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,745cc229cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,535mm179in
4,690mm185in
Width
1,900mm75in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,303mm51in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
2,450mm96in
2,780mm109in
Front track
1,583mm62in
1,600mm63in
Rear track
1,600mm63in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance-
105mm4in
Trunk volume
264L
249L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
67L
74L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6PowerTorque
  • Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.86,500 rpm2,250-4,500 rpm7,200 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V66,800 rpm3,600-5,600 rpm7,100 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.7 s
2.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.8 s
2.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.7 s
7.8 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
59.2 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Likely limited
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.6 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
4.5 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.8 s
6.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.9 s
8.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.7 s
10.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
209 km/h
130 mph
230 km/h
143 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
580 hp
433 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 has 20 hp more than Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8.

The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
652 Nm
481 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
1,703 kg
3,754 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.82.8 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62.8 s

Although Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 has more power, Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: 3.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
354 hp/t
264 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
604 km
375 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
521 km
324 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
580 hp
433 kW
2.8 s
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
Power
580 hp
433 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
4,535 mm
178.5 in
Height
1,303 mm
51.3 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
Power
580 hp
433 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK

Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
2.8 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
2.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
354 hp/t
264 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
580 hp
433 kW
600 hp
447 kW
Torque
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
652 Nm
481 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.8 s
2.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
1,703 kg
3,754 lb
Fuel consumption
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
4,535 mm
178.5 in
Height
1,303 mm
51.3 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
604 km
375 mi
521 km
324 mi
Trunk score
264 L
9.3 cu ft
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
354 hp/t
264 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6
Consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.43 LC100 km24.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi31.26 LC100 mi39.99 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,914 LC/year3,728 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8

  • Has 98 Nm more
  • Is 63 kg lighter
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 82 km (51 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 15 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8
Nissan GT-R (R35) Nismo 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Turbo 3.8
Turbo S 3.6
VS
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8vsPorsche911 (992)Facelift 2024Turbo S 3.6
Nismo 3.8 V6
Nismo 3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
Turbo 3.8
Turbo S 3.8
VS
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8vsPorsche911 (991 II)Turbo S 3.8
Nismo 3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
Turbo 3.8
Turbo S 3.8
VS
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8vsPorsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8
Nismo 3.8 V6
4.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsMcLarenGT4.0 V8
Turbo 3.8
3.0
VS
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8vsPorsche911 Dakar (992)3.0
Nismo 3.8 V6
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
Turbo 3.8
Turbo 3.8
VS
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8vsPorsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo 3.8
Nismo 3.8 V6
3.9 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsFerrariRoma3.9 V8
Turbo 3.8
Turbo S 3.8
VS
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8vsPorsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
Nismo 3.8 V6
R 4.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017R 4.0 V8
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster