Car comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6vsMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016

Nismo 3.8 V6

600 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2019-2023
VS

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192)

63 V8

585 hp3982 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    315 km/h
    196 mph
  • Most powerful
    600 hp
    447 kW
  • Lightest
    1,703 kg
    3,754 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    352 hp/t
    263 kW/t
    2.8 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    521 km
    324 mi
  • Best performance score
    93/100
  • Best economy score
    69/100

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8

  • Highest torque
    800 Nm
    590 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    14.1 L/100 km
    16.7 mpg US
    20.0 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    321 L
  • Best overall score
    80/100
  • Best practicality score
    52/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
Power
600hp447kW
585hp436kW
Torque
652Nm481lb-ft
800Nm590lb-ft
Curb weight
1,703kg3,754lb
1,895kg4,178lb
Gross weight
2,200kg4,850lb
-
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
38.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
50.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.8s
3.2s
0-200 km/h
7.8s
Calculated
9.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.7s
Calculated
3.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
10.2s
Calculated
10.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
352hp/t263kW/t160hp/1000 lb
Calculated
309hp/t230kW/t140hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
383Nm/t256lb-ft/ton
Calculated
422Nm/t282lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
521km324mi
Calculated
496km308mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,799cc232cu in
3,982cc243cu in
Length
4,690mm185in
4,728mm186in
Width
1,895mm75in
1,984mm78in
Height
1,370mm54in
1,354mm53in
Wheelbase
2,780mm109in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,600mm63in
1,683mm66in
Rear track
1,600mm63in
1,686mm66in
Ground clearance
105mm4in
-
Trunk volume
249L
321L
Max trunk volume-
675L
Doors
2
3
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
74L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8PowerTorque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V66,800 rpm3,600-5,600 rpm7,100 rpm
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V85,500-6,500 rpm2,500-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.7 s
3.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.8 s
3.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
7.8 s
9.4 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.8 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
4.5 s
4.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.7 s
7.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.6 s
9.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.2 s
10.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
230 km/h
143 mph
215 km/h
134 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
585 hp
436 kW

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 has 15 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
652 Nm
481 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
800 Nm
590 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
1,703 kg
3,754 lb
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
1,895 kg
4,178 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62.8 s
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V83.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
309 hp/t
230 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
521 km
324 mi
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
496 km
308 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
585 hp
436 kW
3.2 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
Power
585 hp
436 kW
0-100 km/h3.2 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
321 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,728 mm
186.1 in
Height
1,354 mm
53.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
Power
585 hp
436 kW
0-100 km/h3.2 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
2.8 s
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK
3.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
309 hp/t
230 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
Power
600 hp
447 kW
585 hp
436 kW
Torque
652 Nm
481 lb-ft
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.8 s
3.2 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,703 kg
3,754 lb
1,895 kg
4,178 lb
Fuel consumption
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
321 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,728 mm
186.1 in
Height
1,354 mm
53.3 in
Range score
521 km
324 mi
496 km
308 mi
Trunk score
249 L
8.8 cu ft
321 L
11.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
309 hp/t
230 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8
Consumption14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km24.85 LC100 km24.68 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi39.99 LC100 mi39.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal2,115 L559 US gal465 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,728 LC/year3,701 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Is 192 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 44 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 25 km (15 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8

  • Has 148 Nm more
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 72 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Nissan GT-R (R35) Nismo 3.8 V6
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Nismo 3.8 V6
Nismo 3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
63 V8
R 4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017R 4.0 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
63 V8
S 4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
Turbo 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsPorsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
63 V8
C 4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
4.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsMcLarenGT4.0 V8
63 V8
AMG GLE 63 S V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)AMG GLE 63 S V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
63 V8
AMG GLE 63 S V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023AMG GLE 63 S V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
3.9 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsFerrariRoma3.9 V8
63 V8
AMG C 63 S V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8
Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 vs Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster