Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) C 4.0 V8vsMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192)
63 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.2 s
- Most powerful585 hp436 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Largest trunk321 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score93/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) C 4.0 V8
- Fastest top speed316 km/h196 mph
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight336 hp/t251 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range570 km354 mi
- Best economy score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 558hp416kW | 585hp436kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,895kg4,178lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | - |
| Top speed | 316 km/h 196 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.3s99% target: 313 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 50.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 3.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.8s Calculated | 9.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 3.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 10.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 336hp/t251kW/t152hp/1000 lb Calculated | 309hp/t230kW/t140hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 410Nm/t274lb-ft/ton Calculated | 422Nm/t282lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 570km354mi Calculated | 496km308mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,544mm179in | 4,728mm186in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 1,984mm78in |
| Height | 1,259mm50in | 1,354mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,630mm104in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,684mm66in | 1,683mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | 1,686mm66in |
| Trunk volume | 165L | 321L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 675L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 259g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) C 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 5,750-6,750 rpm | 1,900-5,750 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 3.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.8 s | 9.4 s |
| Top speed | 316 km/h 196 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 4.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 9.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 10.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 206 km/h 128 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 558 hp 416 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 585 hp 436 kW |
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8 has 27 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) C 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) C 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 3.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 3.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) C 4.0 V8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) C 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 336 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 309 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 570 km 354 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 496 km 308 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 558 hp 416 kW | 3.7 s | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 585 hp 436 kW | 3.2 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 |
| 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) C 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | 3.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 336 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 309 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 558 hp 416 kW | 585 hp 436 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 3.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 316 km/h 196 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 570 km 354 mi | 496 km 308 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 259 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 165 L 5.8 cu ft | 321 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 336 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 309 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) C 4.0 V8 | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK | 14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km | 24.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi | 39.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal | 2,115 L559 US gal465 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year | 3,701 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) C 4.0 V8
- Is 235 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 74 km (46 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 156 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























