Car comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6vsBMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016

Nismo 3.8 V6

600 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2019-2023
VS

BMW M4 (G82)

CSL 3.0

550 hp2993 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2022-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    315 km/h
    196 mph
  • Most powerful
    600 hp
    447 kW
  • Highest torque
    652 Nm
    481 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    352 hp/t
    263 kW/t
    2.8 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    78/100
  • Best performance score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    46/100

BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0

  • Lightest
    1,625 kg
    3,583 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.1 L/100 km
    23.3 mpg US
    28.0 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    584 km
    363 mi
  • Largest trunk
    440 L
  • Best economy score
    80/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
Power
600hp447kW
550hp410kW
Torque
652Nm481lb-ft
650Nm479lb-ft
Curb weight
1,703kg3,754lb
1,625kg3,583lb
Gross weight
2,200kg4,850lb
1,970kg4,343lb
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
307 km/h
191 mph
To 99% top speed
38.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
52.6s99% target: 304 km/h / 189 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.8s
3.7s
0-200 km/h
7.8s
Calculated
10.7s
0-60 mph
2.7s
Calculated
3.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK
10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
10.2s
Calculated
11.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
352hp/t263kW/t160hp/1000 lb
Calculated
338hp/t252kW/t154hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
383Nm/t256lb-ft/ton
Calculated
400Nm/t268lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
521km324mi
Calculated
584km363mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,799cc232cu in
2,993cc183cu in
Length
4,690mm185in
4,794mm189in
Width
1,895mm75in
1,921mm76in
Height
1,370mm54in
1,386mm55in
Wheelbase
2,780mm109in
2,857mm112in
Front track
1,600mm63in
1,623mm64in
Rear track
1,600mm63in
1,609mm63in
Ground clearance
105mm4in
113mm4in
Trunk volume
249L
440L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank
74L
59L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0PowerTorque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
  • BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V66,800 rpm3,600-5,600 rpm7,100 rpm
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.06,250 rpm2,750-5,950 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.7 s
3.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.8 s
3.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
7.8 s
10.7 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
307 km/h
191 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.8 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
4.5 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.7 s
7.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.6 s
9.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.2 s
11.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
230 km/h
143 mph
207 km/h
129 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
550 hp
410 kW

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 has 50 hp more than BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0.

The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: 50 hp (37 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
652 Nm
481 lb-ft
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
650 Nm
479 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
1,703 kg
3,754 lb
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
1,625 kg
3,583 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
307 km/h
191 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62.8 s
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.03.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 and BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: 4.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
338 hp/t
252 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
521 km
324 mi
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
584 km
363 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
550 hp
410 kW
3.7 s
307 km/h
191 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,794 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,386 mm
54.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK

BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
2.8 s
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK
3.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
338 hp/t
252 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
Power
600 hp
447 kW
550 hp
410 kW
Torque
652 Nm
481 lb-ft
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.8 s
3.7 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
307 km/h
191 mph
Lightness
1,703 kg
3,754 lb
1,625 kg
3,583 lb
Fuel consumption
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,794 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,386 mm
54.6 in
Range score
521 km
324 mi
584 km
363 mi
Trunk score
249 L
8.8 cu ft
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
338 hp/t
252 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0
Consumption14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km24.85 LC100 km17.68 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi39.99 LC100 mi28.45 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,728 LC/year2,651 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6

  • Has 50 hp more
  • Has 2 Nm more
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0

  • Is 78 kg lighter
  • Uses 4.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 63 km (39 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 191 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Nissan GT-R (R35) Nismo 3.8 V6
BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Nismo 3.8 V6
Nismo 3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
CSL 3.0
GTS 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0vsBMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
Nismo 3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
CSL 3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0
Nismo 3.8 V6
Turbo 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsPorsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
CSL 3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0
Nismo 3.8 V6
4.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsMcLarenGT4.0 V8
CSL 3.0
CS 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0vsBMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0
Nismo 3.8 V6
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
CSL 3.0
Competition 4.4 V8
VS
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0vsBMWM8 Coupe (F92)Facelift 2022Competition 4.4 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
3.9 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsFerrariRoma3.9 V8
CSL 3.0
M850i
VS
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0vsBMW8 Series (G15)M850i
Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 vs BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster