BMW M4 (G82)
Car comparison
BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0vsBMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M4 Convertible (F83)
Competition 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed307 km/h191 mph
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lightest1,625 kg3,583 lb
- Best power-to-weight338 hp/t252 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best practicality score44/100
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range690 km429 mi
- Best economy score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,625kg3,583lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | 307 km/h 191 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.6s99% target: 304 km/h / 189 mph Calculated | 57.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 4.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.7s | 15.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 4.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.4s Calculated | 12.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 338hp/t252kW/t154hp/1000 lb Calculated | 251hp/t187kW/t114hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 400Nm/t268lb-ft/ton Calculated | 307Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 584km363mi Calculated | 690km429mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,794mm189in | 4,671mm184in |
| Width | 1,921mm76in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,386mm55in | 1,392mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,857mm112in | 2,812mm111in |
| Front track | 1,623mm64in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 113mm4in | 119mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 220L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 370L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 203g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,750-5,950 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 7,000 rpm | 1,850-5,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 4.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 4.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.7 s | 15.4 s |
| Top speed | 307 km/h 191 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.4 s | 12.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 207 km/h 129 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW |
BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0 has 100 hp more than BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0 and BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0: 100 hp (75 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 307 km/h 191 mph |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 3.7 s |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 4.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0 and BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0 and BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 338 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 584 km 363 mi |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 690 km 429 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 550 hp 410 kW | 3.7 s | 307 km/h 191 mph |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 338 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 4.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 307 km/h 191 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 584 km 363 mi | 690 km 429 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 203 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 338 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0 | BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 15.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 2,284 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0
- Has 100 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 165 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 47 km/h (29 mph) higher top speed
- Has 87 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 220 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 105 km (66 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























