Maserati MC20
Car comparison
Maserati MC20 3.0 V6vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016
Nismo 3.8 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati MC20 3.0 V6
- Fastest top speed335 km/h208 mph Unrestricted325 km/h202 mph Restricted
- Most powerful630 hp470 kW
- Highest torque730 Nm538 lb-ft
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Best power-to-weight420 hp/t313 kW/t2.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Best performance score94/100
- Best economy score76/100
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.8 s
- Best estimated range521 km324 mi
- Largest trunk249 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best practicality score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiMC203.0 V6 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 630hp470kW | 600hp447kW |
| Torque | 730Nm538lb-ft | 652Nm481lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,703kg3,754lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Calculated | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.6s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated | 38.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.9s | 2.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.8s | 7.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.8s Calculated | 2.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.5s Calculated | 10.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 420hp/t313kW/t191hp/1000 lb Calculated | 352hp/t263kW/t160hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 487Nm/t326lb-ft/ton Calculated | 383Nm/t256lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 517km321mi Calculated | 521km324mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,000cc183cu in | 3,799cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,669mm184in | 4,690mm185in |
| Width | 1,965mm77in | 1,895mm75in |
| Height | 1,221mm48in | 1,370mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,780mm109in |
| Front track | 1,681mm66in | 1,600mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,649mm65in | 1,600mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 105mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 150L | 249L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 74L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati MC20 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMC203.0 V6 | 7,500 rpm | 3,000-5,500 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 6,800 rpm | 3,600-5,600 rpm | 7,100 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiMC203.0 V6 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 39.4 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Likely limited | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.6 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.9 s | 8.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.5 s | 10.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 219 km/h 136 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMC203.0 V6 | 630 hp 470 kW |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 600 hp 447 kW |
Maserati MC20 3.0 V6 has 30 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 and Maserati MC20 3.0 V6: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMC203.0 V6 | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 652 Nm 481 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMC203.0 V6 | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 1,703 kg 3,754 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMC203.0 V6 | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMC203.0 V6 | 2.9 s |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 2.8 s |
Although Maserati MC20 3.0 V6 has more power, Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 and Maserati MC20 3.0 V6: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMC203.0 V6 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati MC20 3.0 V6 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMC203.0 V6 | 420 hp/t 313 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 352 hp/t 263 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMC203.0 V6 | 517 km 321 mi |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 521 km 324 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMC203.0 V6 | 630 hp 470 kW | 2.9 s | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 600 hp 447 kW | 2.8 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMC203.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMC203.0 V6 |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 |
| 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati MC20 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMC203.0 V6 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 2.9 s |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMC203.0 V6 | 420 hp/t 313 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 352 hp/t 263 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiMC203.0 V6 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 630 hp 470 kW | 600 hp 447 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft | 652 Nm 481 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.9 s | 2.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,703 kg 3,754 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 517 km 321 mi | 521 km 324 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 150 L 5.3 cu ft | 249 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 420 hp/t 313 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp | 352 hp/t 263 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati MC20 3.0 V6 | Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK | 14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.30 LC100 km | 24.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi | 39.99 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal | 2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,045 LC/year | 3,728 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati MC20 3.0 V6
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 78 Nm more
- Is 203 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 68 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km (2 mi) more estimated range
- Has 99 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























