Car comparison

Maserati MC20 3.0 V6vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Maserati MC20

3.0 V6

630 hp3000 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2020-present
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016

Nismo 3.8 V6

600 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2019-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Maserati MC20 3.0 V6

  • Fastest top speed
    335 km/h
    208 mph Unrestricted
    325 km/h
    202 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    630 hp
    470 kW
  • Highest torque
    730 Nm
    538 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,500 kg
    3,307 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    420 hp/t
    313 kW/t
    2.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.6 L/100 km
    20.3 mpg US
    24.4 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    94/100
  • Best economy score
    76/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMaseratiMC203.0 V6NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
630hp470kW
600hp447kW
Torque
730Nm538lb-ft
652Nm481lb-ft
Curb weight
1,500kg3,307lb
1,703kg3,754lb
Gross weight-
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Calculated
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
59.6s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph
Calculated
38.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.9s
2.8s
0-200 km/h
8.8s
7.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.8s
Calculated
2.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.5s
Calculated
10.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
420hp/t313kW/t191hp/1000 lb
Calculated
352hp/t263kW/t160hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
487Nm/t326lb-ft/ton
Calculated
383Nm/t256lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
517km321mi
Calculated
521km324mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,000cc183cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,669mm184in
4,690mm185in
Width
1,965mm77in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,221mm48in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,780mm109in
Front track
1,681mm66in
1,600mm63in
Rear track
1,649mm65in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance-
105mm4in
Trunk volume
150L
249L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
60L
74L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Maserati MC20 3.0 V6Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6PowerTorque
  • Maserati MC20 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MaseratiMC203.0 V67,500 rpm3,000-5,500 rpm7,750 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V66,800 rpm3,600-5,600 rpm7,100 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMaseratiMC203.0 V6NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.8 s
2.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.9 s
2.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
8.8 s
7.8 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
39.4 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Likely limited
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.7 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
4.6 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.9 s
6.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.9 s
8.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.5 s
10.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
219 km/h
136 mph
230 km/h
143 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiMC203.0 V6
630 hp
470 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW

Maserati MC20 3.0 V6 has 30 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 and Maserati MC20 3.0 V6: 30 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiMC203.0 V6
730 Nm
538 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
652 Nm
481 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiMC203.0 V6
1,500 kg
3,307 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
1,703 kg
3,754 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiMC203.0 V6
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Maserati MC20 3.0 V6 has more power, Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 and Maserati MC20 3.0 V6: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiMC203.0 V6
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati MC20 3.0 V6 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: 2.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiMC203.0 V6
420 hp/t
313 kW/t
2.4 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiMC203.0 V6
517 km
321 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
521 km
324 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MaseratiMC203.0 V6
630 hp
470 kW
2.9 s
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MaseratiMC203.0 V6
Power
630 hp
470 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
150 L
5.3 cu ft
Length
4,669 mm
183.8 in
Height
1,221 mm
48.1 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MaseratiMC203.0 V6
Power
630 hp
470 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK

Maserati MC20 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MaseratiMC203.0 V6
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
2.9 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
2.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MaseratiMC203.0 V6
420 hp/t
313 kW/t
2.4 kg/hp
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMaseratiMC203.0 V6NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
630 hp
470 kW
600 hp
447 kW
Torque
730 Nm
538 lb-ft
652 Nm
481 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.9 s
2.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,500 kg
3,307 lb
1,703 kg
3,754 lb
Fuel consumption
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
150 L
5.3 cu ft
Length
4,669 mm
183.8 in
Height
1,221 mm
48.1 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
517 km
321 mi
521 km
324 mi
Trunk score
150 L
5.3 cu ft
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
420 hp/t
313 kW/t
2.4 kg/hp
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMaserati MC20 3.0 V6Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6
Consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.30 LC100 km24.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.67 LC100 mi39.99 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,045 LC/year3,728 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Maserati MC20 3.0 V6

  • Has 30 hp more
  • Has 78 Nm more
  • Is 203 kg lighter
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 68 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Smallest trunk

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6

  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km (2 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 99 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Maserati MC20 3.0 V6
Nissan GT-R (R35) Nismo 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Maserati MC20 3.0 V6 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster