Car comparison

McLaren 600LT 3.8 V8vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

McLaren 600LT

3.8 V8

600 hp3799 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2018-2021
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016

Nismo 3.8 V6

600 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2019-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

McLaren 600LT 3.8 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    328 km/h
    204 mph
  • Most powerful
    600 hp
    447 kW
  • Lightest
    1,356 kg
    2,989 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    442 hp/t
    330 kW/t
    2.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.7 L/100 km
    20.1 mpg US
    24.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    16.3 L/100 km
    14.4 mpg US
    17.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.1 L/100 km
    25.8 mpg US
    31.0 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    615 km
    382 mi
  • Best performance score
    94/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMcLaren600LT3.8 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600hp447kW
600hp447kW
Torque
620Nm457lb-ft
652Nm481lb-ft
Curb weight
1,356kg2,989lb
1,703kg3,754lb
Gross weight-
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
328 km/h
204 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
46.5s99% target: 325 km/h / 202 mph
Calculated
38.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.9s
2.8s
0-200 km/h
8.2s
7.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.8s
Calculated
2.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.3L/100 km14.4mpg US17.3mpg UK
19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.4s
Calculated
10.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
442hp/t330kW/t201hp/1000 lb
Calculated
352hp/t263kW/t160hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
457Nm/t306lb-ft/ton
Calculated
383Nm/t256lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
615km382mi
Calculated
521km324mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,799cc232cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,597mm181in
4,690mm185in
Width
1,930mm76in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,194mm47in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
2,667mm105in
2,780mm109in
Front track
1,676mm66in
1,600mm63in
Rear track
1,588mm63in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance-
105mm4in
Trunk volume
150L
249L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
72L
74L
CO2 emissions
266g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

McLaren 600LT 3.8 V8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6PowerTorque
  • McLaren 600LT 3.8 V8: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
McLaren600LT3.8 V87,500 rpm5,500-6,500 rpm8,500 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V66,800 rpm3,600-5,600 rpm7,100 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMcLaren600LT3.8 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.8 s
2.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.9 s
2.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
8.2 s
7.8 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
39.7 s
-
Top speed
328 km/h
204 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.8 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
4.6 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.8 s
6.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.8 s
8.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.4 s
10.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
226 km/h
140 mph
230 km/h
143 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
McLaren600LT3.8 V8
600 hp
447 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
McLaren600LT3.8 V8
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
652 Nm
481 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
McLaren600LT3.8 V8
1,356 kg
2,989 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
1,703 kg
3,754 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
McLaren600LT3.8 V8
328 km/h
204 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
McLaren600LT3.8 V82.9 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 and McLaren 600LT 3.8 V8: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
McLaren600LT3.8 V8
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between McLaren 600LT 3.8 V8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: 2.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
McLaren600LT3.8 V8
442 hp/t
330 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
McLaren600LT3.8 V8
615 km
382 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
521 km
324 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
McLaren600LT3.8 V8
600 hp
447 kW
2.9 s
328 km/h
204 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
McLaren600LT3.8 V8
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
328 km/h
204 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
150 L
5.3 cu ft
Length
4,597 mm
181.0 in
Height
1,194 mm
47.0 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
McLaren600LT3.8 V8
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
328 km/h
204 mph
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK

McLaren 600LT 3.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
McLaren600LT3.8 V8
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
2.9 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
2.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
McLaren600LT3.8 V8
442 hp/t
330 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMcLaren600LT3.8 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
600 hp
447 kW
Torque
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
652 Nm
481 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.9 s
2.8 s
Top speed
328 km/h
204 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,356 kg
2,989 lb
1,703 kg
3,754 lb
Fuel consumption
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
150 L
5.3 cu ft
Length
4,597 mm
181.0 in
Height
1,194 mm
47.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
615 km
382 mi
521 km
324 mi
CO2 score
266 g/km
-
Trunk score
150 L
5.3 cu ft
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
442 hp/t
330 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMcLaren 600LT 3.8 V8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6
Consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.47 LC100 km24.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.95 LC100 mi39.99 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,071 LC/year3,728 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

McLaren 600LT 3.8 V8

  • Is 347 kg lighter
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 90 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 94 km (59 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Smallest trunk

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6

  • Has 32 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 99 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
McLaren 600LT 3.8 V8
Nissan GT-R (R35) Nismo 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.8 V8
3.8 V8
VS
McLaren600LT3.8 V8vsMcLaren600LT Spider3.8 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
Nismo 3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
3.8 V8
3.8 V8
VS
McLaren600LT3.8 V8vsMcLaren620R3.8 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
3.8 V8
3.8 V8
VS
McLaren600LT3.8 V8vsMcLaren570S3.8 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
Turbo 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsPorsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
3.8 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLaren600LT3.8 V8vsMcLarenGT4.0 V8
3.8 V8
3.8 V8
VS
McLaren600LT3.8 V8vsMcLaren540C3.8 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
3.8 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLaren600LT3.8 V8vsMcLarenGTS4.0 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
3.9 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsFerrariRoma3.9 V8
3.8 V8
3.0 V6
VS
McLaren600LT3.8 V8vsMcLarenArtura3.0 V6
McLaren 600LT 3.8 V8 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster