Car comparison

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-SkyactivvsMazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-60

2.5 e-Skyactiv

192 hp2488 ccHybridAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2022-present
VS

Mazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018

2.0 SKYACTIV-G

150 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2018-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Highest torque
    261 Nm
    193 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.5 L/100 km
    156.8 mpg US
    188.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    3,333 km
    2,071 mi
  • Largest trunk
    477 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    100/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
192hp143kW
150hp112kW
Torque
261Nm193lb-ft
207Nm153lb-ft
Curb weight
2,072kg4,568lb
1,310kg2,888lb
Gross weight
2,667kg5,880lb
1,773kg3,909lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
200 km/h
124 mph
To 99% top speed
64.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
76.9s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
38.7s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
1.5L/100 km156.8mpg US188.3mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb
Calculated
115hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
126Nm/t84lb-ft/ton
Calculated
158Nm/t106lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
3,333km2,071mi
Calculated
629km391mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,488cc152cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,745mm187in
4,275mm168in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,765mm69in
Height
1,685mm66in
1,535mm60in
Wheelbase
2,870mm113in
2,570mm101in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,523mm60in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,521mm60in
Ground clearance
175mm7in
155mm6in
Trunk volume
477L
350L
Max trunk volume
1,726L
1,260L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
44L
CO2 emissions-
160g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-SkyactivMazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-GPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv6,000 rpm-6,250 rpm
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G6,000 rpm2,800 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.7 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Limited
200 km/h
124 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
139 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
192 hp
143 kW
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
150 hp
112 kW

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv has 42 hp more than Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G and Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv: 42 hp (31 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
261 Nm
193 lb-ft
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
207 Nm
153 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
2,072 kg
4,568 lb
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
1,310 kg
2,888 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
200 km/h
124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G: 3.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G: 5.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
3,333 km
2,071 mi
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
629 km
391 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
192 hp
143 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
150 hp
112 kW
8.8 s
200 km/h
124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
5.8 s
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
192 hp
143 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
261 Nm
193 lb-ft
207 Nm
153 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Lightness
2,072 kg
4,568 lb
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
Fuel consumption
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
Range score
3,333 km
2,071 mi
629 km
391 mi
CO2 score
-
160 g/km
Trunk score
477 L
16.8 cu ft
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-60 2.5 e-SkyactivMazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G
Consumption1.5 L/100 km156.8 mpg US188.3 mpg UK7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km2.63 LC100 km12.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi4.22 LC100 mi19.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used225 L59 US gal49 UK gal1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal
Annual fuel cost393.75 LC/year1,838 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

  • Has 42 hp more
  • Has 54 Nm more
  • Is 3.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 5.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2,705 km (1,681 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 127 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G

  • Is 762 kg lighter
  • Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
Mazda CX-3 2.0 SKYACTIV-G
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv vs Mazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G - car comparison - FastVsFaster