Car comparison

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSIvsMazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Formentor

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2021-2023
VS

Mazda CX-60

2.5 e-Skyactiv

192 hp2488 ccHybridAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.5 L/100 km
    156.8 mpg US
    188.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    3,333 km
    2,071 mi
  • Largest trunk
    477 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    100/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,521 kg
    3,353 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraFormentor2.0 TSIMazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
190hp142kW
192hp143kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
261Nm193lb-ft
Curb weight
1,521kg3,353lb
2,072kg4,568lb
Gross weight
2,110kg4,652lb
2,667kg5,880lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
71.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
64.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
5.8s
0-200 km/h
34.1s
Calculated
38.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
5.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
1.5L/100 km156.8mpg US188.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
126Nm/t84lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
688km427mi
Calculated
3,333km2,071mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
2,488cc152cu in
Length
4,450mm175in
4,745mm187in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,528mm60in
1,685mm66in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,870mm113in
Front track
1,585mm62in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,559mm61in
1,645mm65in
Ground clearance-
175mm7in
Trunk volume
420L
477L
Max trunk volume-
1,726L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSIMazda CX-60 2.5 e-SkyactivPowerTorque
  • Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv6,000 rpm-6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraFormentor2.0 TSIMazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
5.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
5.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.1 s
38.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
155 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
192 hp
143 kW

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv has 2 hp more than Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI and Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
261 Nm
193 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
1,521 kg
3,353 lb
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
2,072 kg
4,568 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
220 km/h
137 mph
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI7.1 s
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv5.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: 1.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: 6.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
688 km
427 mi
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
3,333 km
2,071 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.1 s
220 km/h
137 mph
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
192 hp
143 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,450 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,528 mm
60.2 in
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.1 s
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
5.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraFormentor2.0 TSIMazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
190 hp
142 kW
192 hp
143 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
261 Nm
193 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
5.8 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,521 kg
3,353 lb
2,072 kg
4,568 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,450 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,528 mm
60.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Range score
688 km
427 mi
3,333 km
2,071 mi
Trunk score
420 L
14.8 cu ft
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Formentor 2.0 TSIMazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK1.5 L/100 km156.8 mpg US188.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km2.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi4.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal225 L59 US gal49 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year393.75 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI

  • Has 59 Nm more
  • Is 551 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 6.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2,646 km (1,644 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 57 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5i P300e
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
2.5 e-Skyactiv
350h
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
2.0 TSI
GLA 220d
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.0 TSI
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI vs Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv - car comparison - FastVsFaster