Car comparison

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-SkyactivvsLexus NX II (AZ20) 350h

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-60

2.5 e-Skyactiv

192 hp2488 ccHybridAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2022-present
VS

Lexus NX II (AZ20)

350h

190 hp2487 ccGasolineAWDCVTNaturally aspiratedSUV2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Highest torque
    261 Nm
    193 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.5 L/100 km
    156.8 mpg US
    188.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    3,333 km
    2,071 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    100/100

Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h

  • Lightest
    1,870 kg
    4,123 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    102 hp/t
    76 kW/t
    9.8 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    545 L
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Power
192hp143kW
190hp142kW
Torque
261Nm193lb-ft
239Nm176lb-ft
Curb weight
2,072kg4,568lb
1,870kg4,123lb
Gross weight
2,667kg5,880lb
2,380kg5,247lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
64.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
85.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
38.7s
Calculated
51.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
1.5L/100 km156.8mpg US188.3mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb
Calculated
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
126Nm/t84lb-ft/ton
Calculated
128Nm/t86lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
3,333km2,071mi
Calculated
859km534mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,488cc152cu in
2,487cc152cu in
Length
4,745mm187in
4,660mm183in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,865mm73in
Height
1,685mm66in
1,670mm66in
Wheelbase
2,870mm113in
2,690mm106in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,625mm64in
Ground clearance
175mm7in
195mm8in
Trunk volume
477L
545L
Max trunk volume
1,726L
1,436L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-SkyactivLexus NX II (AZ20) 350hPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv: Power / Torque
  • Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv6,000 rpm-6,250 rpm
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h6,000 rpm4,300-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.7 s
51.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
144 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
192 hp
143 kW
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
190 hp
142 kW

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv has 2 hp more than Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h.

The biggest power difference is between Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h and Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
261 Nm
193 lb-ft
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
239 Nm
176 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
2,072 kg
4,568 lb
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
1,870 kg
4,123 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv5.8 s
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h7.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h: 1.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h: 4.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
3,333 km
2,071 mi
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
859 km
534 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
192 hp
143 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
190 hp
142 kW
7.7 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
545 L
19.2 cu ft
Length
4,660 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,670 mm
65.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
5.8 s
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Power
192 hp
143 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
261 Nm
193 lb-ft
239 Nm
176 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
2,072 kg
4,568 lb
1,870 kg
4,123 lb
Fuel consumption
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
545 L
19.2 cu ft
Length
4,660 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,670 mm
65.7 in
Range score
3,333 km
2,071 mi
859 km
534 mi
Trunk score
477 L
16.8 cu ft
545 L
19.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-60 2.5 e-SkyactivLexus NX II (AZ20) 350h
Consumption1.5 L/100 km156.8 mpg US188.3 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km2.63 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi4.22 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used225 L59 US gal49 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost393.75 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 22 Nm more
  • Is 1.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 4.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2,474 km (1,537 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h

  • Is 202 kg lighter
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 68 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
350h
300
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
2.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5i P300e
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
350h
200t
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsLexusNX I (AZ10)200t
2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.0 TSI
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
350h
200
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsLexusUX200
2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.0 TSI
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
350h
GLB 220d
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d
2.5 e-Skyactiv
GLA 220d
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
350h
2.2 JTDM
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv vs Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h - car comparison - FastVsFaster