Volkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsMazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-60
2.5 e-Skyactiv
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed214 km/h133 mph
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,601 kg3,530 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t88 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption1.5 L/100 km156.8 mpg US188.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range3,333 km2,071 mi
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score100/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 261Nm193lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,601kg3,530lb | 2,072kg4,568lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 2,667kg5,880lb |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.6s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 64.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.8s Calculated | 38.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 1.5L/100 km156.8mpg US188.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 126Nm/t84lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 866km538mi Calculated | 3,333km2,071mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,488cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,509mm178in | 4,745mm187in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,890mm74in |
| Height | 1,684mm66in | 1,685mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,679mm105in | 2,870mm113in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,645mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 201mm8in | 175mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 615L | 477L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | 1,726L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 6,000 rpm | - | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.8 s | 38.7 s |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 192 hp 143 kW |
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv has 2 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 261 Nm 193 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,601 kg 3,530 lb |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 2,072 kg 4,568 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.4 s |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 1.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 1.5 L/100 km 156.8 mpg US 188.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 5.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 866 km 538 mi |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 3,333 km 2,071 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 192 hp 143 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv |
| 1.5 L/100 km 156.8 mpg US 188.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 1.5 L/100 km 156.8 mpg US 188.3 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | 1.5 L/100 km 156.8 mpg US 188.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 261 Nm 193 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,601 kg 3,530 lb | 2,072 kg 4,568 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 1.5 L/100 km 156.8 mpg US 188.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 866 km 538 mi | 3,333 km 2,071 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI | Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 1.5 L/100 km156.8 mpg US188.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 2.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 4.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 225 L59 US gal49 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 393.75 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Has 59 Nm more
- Is 471 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 138 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 5.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2,468 km (1,533 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























