Car comparison

Volkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsMazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2020-2023
VS

Mazda CX-60

2.5 e-Skyactiv

192 hp2488 ccHybridAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    214 km/h
    133 mph
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,601 kg
    3,530 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    119 hp/t
    88 kW/t
    8.4 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    615 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.5 L/100 km
    156.8 mpg US
    188.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    3,333 km
    2,071 mi
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    100/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSIMazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
190hp142kW
192hp143kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
261Nm193lb-ft
Curb weight
1,601kg3,530lb
2,072kg4,568lb
Gross weight
2,190kg4,828lb
2,667kg5,880lb
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
72.6s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
64.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
5.8s
0-200 km/h
39.8s
Calculated
38.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
5.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
1.5L/100 km156.8mpg US188.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
126Nm/t84lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
866km538mi
Calculated
3,333km2,071mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
2,488cc152cu in
Length
4,509mm178in
4,745mm187in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,684mm66in
1,685mm66in
Wheelbase
2,679mm105in
2,870mm113in
Front track
1,586mm62in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,576mm62in
1,645mm65in
Ground clearance
201mm8in
175mm7in
Trunk volume
615L
477L
Max trunk volume
1,655L
1,726L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIMazda CX-60 2.5 e-SkyactivPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI5,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm5,250 rpm
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv6,000 rpm-6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSIMazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
5.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
5.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
39.8 s
38.7 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
155 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
192 hp
143 kW

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv has 2 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
261 Nm
193 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,601 kg
3,530 lb
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
2,072 kg
4,568 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
214 km/h
133 mph
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 1.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 5.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
119 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
866 km
538 mi
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
3,333 km
2,071 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
214 km/h
133 mph
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
192 hp
143 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,509 mm
177.5 in
Height
1,684 mm
66.3 in
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
7.4 s
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
5.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
119 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSIMazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
190 hp
142 kW
192 hp
143 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
261 Nm
193 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
5.8 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,601 kg
3,530 lb
2,072 kg
4,568 lb
Fuel consumption
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,509 mm
177.5 in
Height
1,684 mm
66.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Range score
866 km
538 mi
3,333 km
2,071 mi
Trunk score
615 L
21.7 cu ft
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIMazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
Consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK1.5 L/100 km156.8 mpg US188.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.73 LC100 km2.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.87 LC100 mi4.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal225 L59 US gal49 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,759 LC/year393.75 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Has 59 Nm more
  • Is 471 kg lighter
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 138 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 5.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2,468 km (1,533 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI vs Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv - car comparison - FastVsFaster