Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220dvsMazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247)

GLA 220d

190 hp1950 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2020-2023
VS

Mazda CX-60

2.5 e-Skyactiv

192 hp2488 ccHybridAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.5 L/100 km
    156.8 mpg US
    188.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    3,333 km
    2,071 mi
  • Largest trunk
    477 L
  • Best economy score
    100/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d

  • Fastest top speed
    219 km/h
    136 mph
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,595 kg
    3,516 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    119 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.4 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220dMazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
190hp142kW
192hp143kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
261Nm193lb-ft
Curb weight
1,595kg3,516lb
2,072kg4,568lb
Gross weight
2,190kg4,828lb
2,667kg5,880lb
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
73.7s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
64.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
5.8s
0-200 km/h
35.7s
Calculated
38.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
5.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
1.5L/100 km156.8mpg US188.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton
Calculated
126Nm/t84lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
962km598mi
Calculated
3,333km2,071mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,950cc119cu in
2,488cc152cu in
Length
4,410mm174in
4,745mm187in
Width
1,834mm72in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,611mm63in
1,685mm66in
Wheelbase
2,729mm107in
2,870mm113in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,606mm63in
1,645mm65in
Ground clearance
143mm6in
175mm7in
Trunk volume
425L
477L
Max trunk volume
1,420L
1,726L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220dMazda CX-60 2.5 e-SkyactivPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d3,800 rpm1,600-2,600 rpm4,050 rpm
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv6,000 rpm-6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220dMazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
5.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
5.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.7 s
38.7 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
155 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
190 hp
142 kW
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
192 hp
143 kW

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv has 2 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d and Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
261 Nm
193 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
2,072 kg
4,568 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
219 km/h
136 mph
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d7.3 s
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv5.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d: 1.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d: 3.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
962 km
598 mi
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
3,333 km
2,071 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
190 hp
142 kW
7.3 s
219 km/h
136 mph
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
192 hp
143 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,410 mm
173.6 in
Height
1,611 mm
63.4 in
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
7.3 s
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
5.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220dMazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
190 hp
142 kW
192 hp
143 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
261 Nm
193 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
5.8 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
2,072 kg
4,568 lb
Fuel consumption
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,410 mm
173.6 in
Height
1,611 mm
63.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Range score
962 km
598 mi
3,333 km
2,071 mi
Trunk score
425 L
15.0 cu ft
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220dMazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
Consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK1.5 L/100 km156.8 mpg US188.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.28 LC100 km2.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.93 LC100 mi4.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used795 L210 US gal175 UK gal225 L59 US gal49 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,391 LC/year393.75 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d

  • Has 139 Nm more
  • Is 477 kg lighter
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 3.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2,371 km (1,473 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 52 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GLA 220d
GLA 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220dvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d
2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
GLA 220d
GLA 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220dvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
2.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5i P300e
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
GLA 220d
GLA 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220dvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d
2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.0 TSI
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
GLA 220d
GLB 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220dvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d
2.5 e-Skyactiv
350h
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
GLA 220d
GLB 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220dvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d
2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.0 TSI
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
GLA 220d
EQE 300 98 kWh
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220dvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh
2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d vs Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv - car comparison - FastVsFaster