Car comparison

Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020 1.5i P300evsMazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020

1.5i P300e

200 hp1498 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2023
VS

Mazda CX-60

2.5 e-Skyactiv

192 hp2488 ccHybridAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e

  • Fastest top speed
    216 km/h
    134 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    280 Nm
    207 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    95 hp/t
    71 kW/t
    10.5 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    494 L
  • Best economy score
    100/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Lightest
    2,072 kg
    4,568 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.5 L/100 km
    156.8 mpg US
    188.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    3,333 km
    2,071 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300eMazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
200hp149kW
192hp143kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
261Nm193lb-ft
Curb weight
2,098kg4,625lb
2,072kg4,568lb
Gross weight
2,670kg5,886lb
2,667kg5,880lb
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
80.2s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
64.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
5.8s
0-200 km/h
39.2s
Calculated
38.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
5.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
2L/100 km117.6mpg US141.2mpg UK
1.5L/100 km156.8mpg US188.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
95hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb
Calculated
93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
133Nm/t89lb-ft/ton
Calculated
126Nm/t84lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
2,880km1,790mi
Calculated
3,333km2,071mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,498cc91cu in
2,488cc152cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,745mm187in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,648mm65in
1,685mm66in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,870mm113in
Front track
1,625mm64in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,624mm64in
1,645mm65in
Ground clearance
212mm8in
175mm7in
Trunk volume
494L
477L
Max trunk volume
1,170L
1,726L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300eMazda CX-60 2.5 e-SkyactivPowerTorque
  • Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e5,500 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv6,000 rpm-6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300eMazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
5.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
5.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
39.2 s
38.7 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
155 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
200 hp
149 kW
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
192 hp
143 kW

Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e has 8 hp more than Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
261 Nm
193 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
2,098 kg
4,625 lb
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
2,072 kg
4,568 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
216 km/h
134 mph
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e has more power, Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
2.0 L/100 km
117.6 mpg US
141.2 mpg UK
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
95 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.5 kg/hp
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
2,880 km
1,790 mi
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
3,333 km
2,071 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
200 hp
149 kW
6.5 s
216 km/h
134 mph
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
192 hp
143 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
494 L
17.4 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,648 mm
64.9 in
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
2.0 L/100 km
117.6 mpg US
141.2 mpg UK
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
2.0 L/100 km
117.6 mpg US
141.2 mpg UK
6.5 s
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
5.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
95 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.5 kg/hp
2.0 L/100 km
117.6 mpg US
141.2 mpg UK
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300eMazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
200 hp
149 kW
192 hp
143 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
261 Nm
193 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
5.8 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
2,098 kg
4,625 lb
2,072 kg
4,568 lb
Fuel consumption
2.0 L/100 km
117.6 mpg US
141.2 mpg UK
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
494 L
17.4 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,648 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Range score
2,880 km
1,790 mi
3,333 km
2,071 mi
Trunk score
494 L
17.4 cu ft
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
95 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.5 kg/hp
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300eMazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
Consumption2 L/100 km117.6 mpg US141.2 mpg UK1.5 L/100 km156.8 mpg US188.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km3.50 LC100 km2.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi5.63 LC100 mi4.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used300 L79 US gal66 UK gal225 L59 US gal49 UK gal
Annual fuel cost525.00 LC/year393.75 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Has 19 Nm more
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 17 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

  • Is 26 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 453 km (282 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar E-Pace 1.5i P300e
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e vs Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv - car comparison - FastVsFaster