Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020 1.5i P300evsMazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-60
2.5 e-Skyactiv
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e
- Fastest top speed216 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight95 hp/t71 kW/t10.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk494 L
- Best economy score100/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Lightest2,072 kg4,568 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption1.5 L/100 km156.8 mpg US188.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range3,333 km2,071 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e | MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 261Nm193lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,098kg4,625lb | 2,072kg4,568lb |
| Gross weight | 2,670kg5,886lb | 2,667kg5,880lb |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 80.2s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 64.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.2s Calculated | 38.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 2L/100 km117.6mpg US141.2mpg UK | 1.5L/100 km156.8mpg US188.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 95hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 133Nm/t89lb-ft/ton Calculated | 126Nm/t84lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 2,880km1,790mi Calculated | 3,333km2,071mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 2,488cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,395mm173in | 4,745mm187in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | 1,890mm74in |
| Height | 1,648mm65in | 1,685mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,870mm113in |
| Front track | 1,625mm64in | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,624mm64in | 1,645mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | 175mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 494L | 477L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,170L | 1,726L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e | 5,500 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 6,000 rpm | - | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e | MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.2 s | 38.7 s |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e | 200 hp 149 kW |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 192 hp 143 kW |
Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e has 8 hp more than Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 261 Nm 193 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e | 2,098 kg 4,625 lb |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 2,072 kg 4,568 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e | 6.5 s |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 5.8 s |
Although Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e has more power, Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e | 2.0 L/100 km 117.6 mpg US 141.2 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 1.5 L/100 km 156.8 mpg US 188.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e | 2,880 km 1,790 mi |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 3,333 km 2,071 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.5 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 192 hp 143 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e |
| 2.0 L/100 km 117.6 mpg US 141.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv |
| 1.5 L/100 km 156.8 mpg US 188.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e | 2.0 L/100 km 117.6 mpg US 141.2 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 1.5 L/100 km 156.8 mpg US 188.3 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp | 2.0 L/100 km 117.6 mpg US 141.2 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | 1.5 L/100 km 156.8 mpg US 188.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e | MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 261 Nm 193 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,098 kg 4,625 lb | 2,072 kg 4,568 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 2.0 L/100 km 117.6 mpg US 141.2 mpg UK | 1.5 L/100 km 156.8 mpg US 188.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 2,880 km 1,790 mi | 3,333 km 2,071 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 494 L 17.4 cu ft | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e | Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 2 L/100 km117.6 mpg US141.2 mpg UK | 1.5 L/100 km156.8 mpg US188.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 3.50 LC100 km | 2.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 5.63 LC100 mi | 4.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 300 L79 US gal66 UK gal | 225 L59 US gal49 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 525.00 LC/year | 393.75 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 19 Nm more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 17 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
- Is 26 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 453 km (282 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























