Cupra Formentor
Car comparison
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLA (H247)
GLA 220d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range962 km598 mi
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,521 kg3,353 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,521kg3,353lb | 1,595kg3,516lb |
| Gross weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 73.7s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.1s Calculated | 35.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 688km427mi Calculated | 962km598mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,950cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,450mm175in | 4,410mm174in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,528mm60in | 1,611mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 425L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,420L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-2,600 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.1 s | 35.7 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 1,521 kg 3,353 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 688 km 427 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 962 km 598 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.1 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.3 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,521 kg 3,353 lb | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 688 km 427 mi | 962 km 598 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
- Is 74 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 275 km (171 mi) more estimated range
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























