Car comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

P 300 2.0

300 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2020
VS

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    234 km/h
    145 mph
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,813 kg
    3,997 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    165 hp/t
    123 kW/t
    6.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    178 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    673 L
  • Best overall score
    70/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLand RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
300hp224kW
310hp231kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,813kg3,997lb
2,146kg4,731lb
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
72.3s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
81.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.0s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
25.9s
Calculated
30.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.7s
Calculated
6.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.2s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb
Calculated
144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
808km502mi
Calculated
855km532mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,803mm189in
4,950mm195in
Width-
1,923mm76in
Height
1,665mm66in
1,776mm70in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,644mm65in
1,673mm66in
Rear track
1,663mm65in
1,675mm66in
Ground clearance
251mm10in
238mm9in
Trunk volume
673L
314L
Max trunk volume
1,731L
1,886L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
63L
71L
CO2 emissions
178g/km
192g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6PowerTorque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.05,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,220-5,100 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLand RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.7 s
6.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.0 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.9 s
30.3 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.9 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.2 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
100 mph
155 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
300 hp
224 kW
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 has 10 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
1,813 kg
3,997 lb
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2,146 kg
4,731 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
234 km/h
145 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.06.0 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T66.5 s

Although Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 has more power, Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
808 km
502 mi
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
855 km
532 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
300 hp
224 kW
6.0 s
234 km/h
145 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
6.5 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
6.0 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLand RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
310 hp
231 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.0 s
6.5 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,813 kg
3,997 lb
2,146 kg
4,731 lb
Fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Range score
808 km
502 mi
855 km
532 mi
CO2 score
178 g/km
192 g/km
Trunk score
673 L
23.8 cu ft
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0

  • Is 333 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 359 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 14 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 48 km (30 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

P 300 2.0
2.0t
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
2.0 T6
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
P 300 2.0
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
P 300 2.0
2.0 P300
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
2.0 T6
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
P 300 2.0
3.0d
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
P 300 2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
P 300 2.0
50 TDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
P 300 2.0
2.0
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
2.0 T6
3.6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsCadillacXT53.6
P 300 2.0
2.0 TFSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsAUDISQ22.0 TFSI
2.0 T6
3.0 V6 TSI
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 vs Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster