Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6vsLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

P 300 2.0

300 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    310 hp
    231 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    910 km
    566 mi
  • Best performance score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0

  • Lightest
    1,813 kg
    3,997 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    165 hp/t
    123 kW/t
    6.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    178 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    673 L
  • Best overall score
    70/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
310hp231kW
300hp224kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
2,016kg4,445lb
1,813kg3,997lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
234 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
71.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
72.3s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.0s
0-200 km/h
23.9s
Calculated
25.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
5.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
910km566mi
Calculated
808km502mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,803mm189in
Width
1,902mm75in
-
Height
1,658mm65in
1,665mm66in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,874mm113in
Front track-
1,644mm65in
Rear track-
1,663mm65in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
251mm10in
Trunk volume
505L
673L
Max trunk volume
1,432L
1,731L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
71L
63L
CO2 emissions
181g/km
178g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,220-5,100 rpm6,000 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.05,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
5.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.9 s
25.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
234 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
11.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
160 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
300 hp
224 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 has 10 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
2,016 kg
4,445 lb
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
1,813 kg
3,997 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
234 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65.9 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.06.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
910 km
566 mi
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
808 km
502 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
300 hp
224 kW
6.0 s
234 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
5.9 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
6.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
310 hp
231 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
2,016 kg
4,445 lb
1,813 kg
3,997 lb
Fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
Range score
910 km
566 mi
808 km
502 mi
CO2 score
181 g/km
178 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T6Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 103 km (64 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0

  • Is 203 kg lighter
  • Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 168 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 3 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
P 300 2.0
2.0t
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
2.0 T6
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
P 300 2.0
2.0 P300
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
P 300 2.0
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
2.0 T6
3.0d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
2.0 T6
50 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
P 300 2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
2.0 T6
3.6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsCadillacXT53.6
2.0 T6
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
P 300 2.0
2.0
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
2.0 T6
40d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsBMWX6 (F16)40d
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster