Car comparison

Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSIvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Ateca

2.0 TSI

300 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

P 300 2.0

300 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    247 km/h
    153 mph
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,557 kg
    3,433 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    193 hp/t
    144 kW/t
    5.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.9 L/100 km
    26.4 mpg US
    31.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    168 g/km
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraAteca2.0 TSILand RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
300hp224kW
300hp224kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,557kg3,433lb
1,813kg3,997lb
Gross weight
2,150kg4,740lb
-
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
57.2s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph
Calculated
72.3s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.2s
6.0s
0-200 km/h
18.7s
Calculated
25.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.0s
Calculated
5.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.3s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
193hp/t144kW/t87hp/1000 lb
Calculated
165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
808km502mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,376mm172in
4,803mm189in
Width
1,841mm72in
-
Height
1,615mm64in
1,665mm66in
Wheelbase
2,631mm104in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,573mm62in
1,644mm65in
Rear track
1,547mm61in
1,663mm65in
Ground clearance-
251mm10in
Trunk volume-
673L
Max trunk volume-
1,731L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank-
63L
CO2 emissions
168g/km
178g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSILand Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0PowerTorque
  • Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraAteca2.0 TSI5,300-6,500 rpm2,000-5,200 rpm6,750 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.05,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraAteca2.0 TSILand RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.0 s
5.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.2 s
6.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.7 s
25.9 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.7 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.2 s
11.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.3 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
174 km/h
108 mph
160 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
300 hp
224 kW
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
300 hp
224 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
1,557 kg
3,433 lb
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
1,813 kg
3,997 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
247 km/h
153 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
234 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAteca2.0 TSI5.2 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.06.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
300 hp
224 kW
5.2 s
247 km/h
153 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
300 hp
224 kW
6.0 s
234 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,376 mm
172.3 in
Height
1,615 mm
63.6 in
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
5.2 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
6.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraAteca2.0 TSILand RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.2 s
6.0 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
1,557 kg
3,433 lb
1,813 kg
3,997 lb
Fuel consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,376 mm
172.3 in
Height
1,615 mm
63.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
Range score
-
808 km
502 mi
CO2 score
168 g/km
178 g/km
Trunk score
-
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Ateca 2.0 TSILand Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0
Consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.95 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.84 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,943 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI

  • Is 256 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 10 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAteca2.0 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
P 300 2.0
2.0t
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
2.0 TSI
VZ 2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAteca2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI
P 300 2.0
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
CupraAteca2.0 TSIvsAUDISQ22.0 TFSI
P 300 2.0
2.0 P300
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAteca2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
P 300 2.0
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
CupraAteca2.0 TSIvsAUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI
P 300 2.0
3.0d
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
2.0 TSI
R 2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAteca2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI
P 300 2.0
50 TDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster