Volkswagen T-Roc I
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Roc I R 2.0 TSIvsCupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Ateca
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Roc I R 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,497 kg3,300 lb
- Best power-to-weight200 hp/t149 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score68/100
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI | CupraAteca2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,497kg3,300lb | 1,557kg3,433lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 53.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 57.1s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.8s Calculated | 18.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 267Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated | 257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,241mm167in | 4,376mm172in |
| Width | 1,819mm72in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,562mm61in | 1,615mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,631mm104in |
| Front track | 1,547mm61in | 1,573mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | 1,547mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 392L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,237L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | - |
| CO2 emissions | - | 168g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Roc I R 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI | - | 2,000-5,200 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI | CupraAteca2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.8 s | 18.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 113 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI | 300 hp 224 kW |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 300 hp 224 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI | 1,497 kg 3,300 lb |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 1,557 kg 3,433 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 247 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI | 4.9 s |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I R 2.0 TSI and Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.2 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I R 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI | CupraAteca2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,497 kg 3,300 lb | 1,557 kg 3,433 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 168 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 392 L 13.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Roc I R 2.0 TSI | Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Roc I R 2.0 TSI
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























