Car comparison

Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSIvsCupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Ateca

2.0 TSI

300 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Cupra Terramar

2.0 TSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    247 km/h
    153 mph
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,557 kg
    3,433 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    193 hp/t
    144 kW/t
    5.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraAteca2.0 TSICupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
300hp224kW
265hp198kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,557kg3,433lb
1,675kg3,693lb
Gross weight
2,150kg4,740lb
2,290kg5,049lb
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
243 km/h
151 mph
To 99% top speed
57.1s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph
Calculated
67.1s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.2s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
18.6s
Calculated
22.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.0s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.3s
Calculated
14.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
193hp/t144kW/t87hp/1000 lb
Calculated
158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
682km424mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,376mm172in
4,519mm178in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,869mm74in
Height
1,615mm64in
1,586mm62in
Wheelbase
2,631mm104in
2,681mm106in
Front track
1,573mm62in
1,590mm63in
Rear track
1,547mm61in
1,580mm62in
Trunk volume-
540L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank-
60L
CO2 emissions
168g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSICupra Terramar 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraAteca2.0 TSI5,300-6,500 rpm2,000-5,200 rpm6,750 rpm
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI5,300-6,500 rpm1,650-4,350 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraAteca2.0 TSICupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.0 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.2 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.6 s
22.4 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
243 km/h
151 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.7 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.2 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.3 s
14.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
174 km/h
108 mph
166 km/h
103 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
300 hp
224 kW
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW

Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI has 35 hp more than Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI: 35 hp (26 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
1,557 kg
3,433 lb
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
1,675 kg
3,693 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
247 km/h
153 mph
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
243 km/h
151 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAteca2.0 TSI5.2 s
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI5.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
300 hp
224 kW
5.2 s
247 km/h
153 mph
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
5.9 s
243 km/h
151 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,376 mm
172.3 in
Height
1,615 mm
63.6 in
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
5.2 s
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraAteca2.0 TSI
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraAteca2.0 TSICupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
300 hp
224 kW
265 hp
198 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.2 s
5.9 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
243 km/h
151 mph
Lightness
1,557 kg
3,433 lb
1,675 kg
3,693 lb
Fuel consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,376 mm
172.3 in
Height
1,615 mm
63.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
Range score
-
682 km
424 mi
CO2 score
168 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Ateca 2.0 TSICupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.95 LC100 km15.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.84 LC100 mi24.78 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,943 LC/year2,310 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI

  • Has 35 hp more
  • Is 118 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAteca2.0 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VZ 2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAteca2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
CupraAteca2.0 TSIvsAUDISQ22.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
CupraAteca2.0 TSIvsAUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
R 2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAteca2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 T4
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
2.0 TSI
2.0 P300
VS
CupraAteca2.0 TSIvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
2.0 TSI
30t
VS
CupraAteca2.0 TSIvsJaguarF-Pace30t
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI vs Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster