Cupra Terramar
Car comparison
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIvsAUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 45 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020
45 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed243 km/h151 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,675 kg3,693 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best practicality score85/100
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range933 km580 mi
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,675kg3,693lb | 1,760kg3,880lb |
| Gross weight | 2,290kg5,049lb | 2,445kg5,390lb |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.1s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 70.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.4s Calculated | 24.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 682km424mi Calculated | 933km580mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,519mm178in | 4,682mm184in |
| Width | 1,869mm74in | 1,893mm75in |
| Height | 1,586mm62in | 1,662mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,819mm111in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,609mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 520L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,520L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 1,650-4,350 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 5,250-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.4 s | 24.0 s |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 5.9 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 682 km 424 mi |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 933 km 580 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.9 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.1 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 682 km 424 mi | 933 km 580 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI | AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 252 km (156 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























