Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024
Car comparison
Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024 2.0 TSIvsCupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Terramar
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best estimated range682 km424 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best power-to-weight181 hp/t135 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,675kg3,693lb |
| Gross weight | 2,060kg4,542lb | 2,290kg5,049lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 67.1s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.2s Calculated | 22.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 633km393mi Calculated | 682km424mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,451mm175in | 4,519mm178in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,869mm74in |
| Height | 1,520mm60in | 1,586mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,679mm105in | 2,681mm106in |
| Front track | 1,583mm62in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 540L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 5,600-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 1,650-4,350 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.2 s | 22.4 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 243 km/h 151 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 6.5 s |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 633 km 393 mi |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 682 km 424 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.9 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 633 km 393 mi | 682 km 424 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI | Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 49 km (30 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























