Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024
Car comparison
Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024 2.0 TSIvsAlfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Tonale
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best power-to-weight181 hp/t135 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range633 km393 mi
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score86/100
Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Gross weight | 2,060kg4,542lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 68.9s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 69.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.3s Calculated | 25.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 633km393mi Calculated | 520km323mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,451mm175in | 4,527mm178in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,520mm60in | 1,657mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,679mm105in | 2,635mm104in |
| Front track | 1,583mm62in | 1,574mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | 1,573mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,550L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 5,600-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 5,200 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.3 s | 25.9 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 272 hp 203 kW |
Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 has 7 hp more than Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 6.5 s |
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 6.5 s |
Although Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 has more power, Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 633 km 393 mi |
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 520 km 323 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 272 hp 203 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 633 km 393 mi | 520 km 323 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI | Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI
- Is 135 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 113 km (70 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























