Car comparison

Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsCupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020

2.0 TSI

300 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2020-present
VS

Cupra Terramar

2.0 TSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    247 km/h
    153 mph
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,551 kg
    3,419 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    193 hp/t
    144 kW/t
    5.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    705 km
    438 mi
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best performance score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSICupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
300hp224kW
265hp198kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,551kg3,419lb
1,675kg3,693lb
Gross weight
2,170kg4,784lb
2,290kg5,049lb
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
243 km/h
151 mph
To 99% top speed
53.4s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph
Calculated
67.1s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
17.5s
Calculated
22.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.7s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.0s
Calculated
14.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb
Calculated
158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton
Calculated
239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
705km438mi
Calculated
682km424mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,386mm173in
4,519mm178in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,869mm74in
Height
1,613mm64in
1,586mm62in
Wheelbase
2,630mm104in
2,681mm106in
Front track
1,575mm62in
1,590mm63in
Rear track
1,549mm61in
1,580mm62in
Ground clearance
160mm6in
-
Trunk volume
485L
540L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSICupra Terramar 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI5,300-6,500 rpm2,000-5,200 rpm6,750 rpm
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI5,300-6,500 rpm1,650-4,350 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSICupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.7 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
17.5 s
22.4 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
243 km/h
151 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.0 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.0 s
14.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
178 km/h
110 mph
166 km/h
103 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
300 hp
224 kW
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI has 35 hp more than Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 35 hp (26 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,551 kg
3,419 lb
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
1,675 kg
3,693 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
247 km/h
153 mph
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
243 km/h
151 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI4.9 s
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI5.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
705 km
438 mi
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
682 km
424 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
300 hp
224 kW
4.9 s
247 km/h
153 mph
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
5.9 s
243 km/h
151 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,386 mm
172.7 in
Height
1,613 mm
63.5 in
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
4.9 s
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSICupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
300 hp
224 kW
265 hp
198 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
5.9 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
243 km/h
151 mph
Lightness
1,551 kg
3,419 lb
1,675 kg
3,693 lb
Fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,386 mm
172.7 in
Height
1,613 mm
63.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
Range score
705 km
438 mi
682 km
424 mi
Trunk score
485 L
17.1 cu ft
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSICupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km15.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi24.78 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year2,310 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Has 35 hp more
  • Is 124 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 23 km (14 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Has 55 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VZ 2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsAUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
R 2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 T4
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsAUDISQ22.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
M35i
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsBMWX2 (F39)M35i
2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
2.0 TSI
JCW 2.0
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020JCW 2.0
Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI vs Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster