Car comparison

BMW X2 (F39) M35ivsCupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X2 (F39)

M35i

306 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2023
VS

Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020

2.0 TSI

300 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2020-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X2 (F39) M35i

  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    306 hp
    228 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.7 L/100 km
    27.0 mpg US
    32.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    859 km
    534 mi
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    68/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Lightest
    1,551 kg
    3,419 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    193 hp/t
    144 kW/t
    5.2 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    485 L
  • Best practicality score
    83/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX2 (F39)M35iCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
306hp228kW
300hp224kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,610kg3,549lb
1,551kg3,419lb
Gross weight
2,190kg4,828lb
2,170kg4,784lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
247 km/h
153 mph
To 99% top speed
55.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
53.4s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.0s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
16.3s
Calculated
17.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.8s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.0s
Calculated
13.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
190hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb
Calculated
193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
280Nm/t187lb-ft/ton
Calculated
258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
859km534mi
Calculated
705km438mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,360mm172in
4,386mm173in
Width
1,824mm72in
1,841mm72in
Height
1,526mm60in
1,613mm64in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,630mm104in
Front track
1,575mm62in
1,575mm62in
Rear track
1,572mm62in
1,549mm61in
Ground clearance
182mm7in
160mm6in
Trunk volume
470L
485L
Max trunk volume
1,355L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X2 (F39) M35iCupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • BMW X2 (F39) M35i: Power / Torque
  • Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX2 (F39)M35i5,000-6,250 rpm1,750-4,500 rpm6,500 rpm
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI5,300-6,500 rpm2,000-5,200 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX2 (F39)M35iCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.8 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.0 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.3 s
17.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
247 km/h
153 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
5.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.6 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.0 s
11.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.0 s
13.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
181 km/h
112 mph
178 km/h
110 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
306 hp
228 kW
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
300 hp
224 kW

BMW X2 (F39) M35i has 6 hp more than Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and BMW X2 (F39) M35i: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
1,610 kg
3,549 lb
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,551 kg
3,419 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
247 km/h
153 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)M35i5.0 s
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI4.9 s

Although BMW X2 (F39) M35i has more power, Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and BMW X2 (F39) M35i: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) M35i and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
190 hp/t
142 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
859 km
534 mi
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
705 km
438 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
306 hp
228 kW
5.0 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
300 hp
224 kW
4.9 s
247 km/h
153 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,386 mm
172.7 in
Height
1,613 mm
63.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

BMW X2 (F39) M35i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
5.0 s
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
4.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
190 hp/t
142 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX2 (F39)M35iCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
306 hp
228 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.0 s
4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
247 km/h
153 mph
Lightness
1,610 kg
3,549 lb
1,551 kg
3,419 lb
Fuel consumption
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,386 mm
172.7 in
Height
1,613 mm
63.5 in
Range score
859 km
534 mi
705 km
438 mi
Trunk score
470 L
16.6 cu ft
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
190 hp/t
142 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X2 (F39) M35iCupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.42 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.00 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,864 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) M35i

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 154 km (96 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Is 59 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 15 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X2 (F39) M35i
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

M35i
M35i
VS
BMWX2 (F39)M35ivsBMWX2 (U10)M35i
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
M35i
40i
VS
BMWX2 (F39)M35ivsBMWX7 (G07)40i
2.0 TSI
VZ 2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI
M35i
JCW 2.0
VS
BMWX2 (F39)M35ivsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020JCW 2.0
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
M35i
35i
VS
BMWX2 (F39)M35ivsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsAUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI
M35i
35i
VS
BMWX2 (F39)M35ivsBMWX6 (F16)35i
2.0 TSI
R 2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsAUDISQ22.0 TFSI
M35i
R 2.0 TSI
VS
BMWX2 (F39)M35ivsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 2020R 2.0 TSI
BMW X2 (F39) M35i vs Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster