Car comparison

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIvsAlfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Terramar

2.0 TSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Alfa Romeo Tonale

2.0 T4

272 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-2025

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    243 km/h
    151 mph
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.8 L/100 km
    26.7 mpg US
    32.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    682 km
    424 mi
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    83/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraTerramar2.0 TSIAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Power
265hp198kW
272hp203kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,675kg3,693lb
1,600kg3,527lb
Gross weight
2,290kg5,049lb
2,250kg4,960lb
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
67.1s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
69.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
22.4s
Calculated
25.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
682km424mi
Calculated
520km323mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,519mm178in
4,527mm178in
Width
1,869mm74in
1,841mm72in
Height
1,586mm62in
1,657mm65in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,635mm104in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,574mm62in
Rear track
1,580mm62in
1,573mm62in
Ground clearance-
212mm8in
Trunk volume
540L
500L
Max trunk volume-
1,550L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
51L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIAlfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4PowerTorque
  • Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI5,300-6,500 rpm1,650-4,350 rpm6,750 rpm
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T45,200 rpm3,000 rpm5,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraTerramar2.0 TSIAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.4 s
25.8 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
166 km/h
103 mph
160 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
272 hp
203 kW

Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 has 7 hp more than Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
1,675 kg
3,693 lb
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
1,600 kg
3,527 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
243 km/h
151 mph
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI5.9 s
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T46.5 s

Although Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 has more power, Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
682 km
424 mi
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
520 km
323 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
5.9 s
243 km/h
151 mph
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
272 hp
203 kW
6.5 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,527 mm
178.2 in
Height
1,657 mm
65.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
5.9 s
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraTerramar2.0 TSIAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Power
265 hp
198 kW
272 hp
203 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.5 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Lightness
1,675 kg
3,693 lb
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
Fuel consumption
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,527 mm
178.2 in
Height
1,657 mm
65.2 in
Range score
682 km
424 mi
520 km
323 mi
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Terramar 2.0 TSIAlfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4
Consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.40 LC100 km17.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.78 LC100 mi27.60 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,310 LC/year2,573 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 161 km (100 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 40 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Is 75 kg lighter
  • Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
2.0 T4
1.5 VGT
VS
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4vsAlfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
2.0 T4
Veloce 54 kWh
VS
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4vsAlfa RomeoJuniorVeloce 54 kWh
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
2.0 T4
2.0 Turbo
VS
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
2.0 T4
2.0 GME
VS
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI vs Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster