AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 45 TFSIvsAUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 II (FY)
50 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,066 km662 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score86/100
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Lightest1,760 kg3,880 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 620Nm457lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,760kg3,880lb | 1,870kg4,123lb |
| Gross weight | 2,445kg5,390lb | 2,565kg5,655lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 67.0s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.0s Calculated | 23.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 332Nm/t222lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 933km580mi Calculated | 1,066km662mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,967cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,682mm184in | 4,663mm184in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,893mm75in |
| Height | 1,662mm65in | 1,659mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,819mm111in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,609mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,520L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 162g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 5,250-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 2,250-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.0 s | 23.8 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 286 hp 213 kW |
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI has 21 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 6.1 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 933 km 580 mi |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 1,066 km 662 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.1 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 286 hp 213 kW | 5.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 933 km 580 mi | 1,066 km 662 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 162 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI
- Has 21 hp more
- Has 250 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 132 km (82 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























