Cupra Formentor
Car comparison
Cupra Formentor VZ 2.0 TSIvsCupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Ateca
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Formentor VZ 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight198 hp/t147 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score68/100
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,557 kg3,433 lb
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | CupraAteca2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,569kg3,459lb | 1,557kg3,433lb |
| Gross weight | 2,140kg4,718lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 55.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 57.1s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.1s Calculated | 18.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 198hp/t147kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated | 257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,450mm175in | 4,376mm172in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,511mm59in | 1,615mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,631mm104in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,573mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,547mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | - |
| CO2 emissions | - | 168g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Formentor VZ 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | 5,450-6,600 rpm | 2,000-5,450 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | CupraAteca2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.1 s | 18.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | 310 hp 231 kW |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 300 hp 224 kW |
Cupra Formentor VZ 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI and Cupra Formentor VZ 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | 1,569 kg 3,459 lb |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 1,557 kg 3,433 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 247 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | 4.9 s |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor VZ 2.0 TSI and Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | 198 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | 310 hp 231 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.2 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | CupraAteca2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,569 kg 3,459 lb | 1,557 kg 3,433 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 168 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 198 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Formentor VZ 2.0 TSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
- Is 12 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























