Cupra Formentor
Car comparison
Cupra Formentor VZ 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
AMG GLA 35
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Formentor VZ 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,569 kg3,459 lb
- Best power-to-weight198 hp/t147 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score68/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35
- Largest trunk435 L
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,569kg3,459lb | 1,675kg3,693lb |
| Gross weight | 2,140kg4,718lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 55.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 62.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.1s Calculated | 17.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 198hp/t147kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 183hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 554km344mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,450mm175in | 4,436mm175in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,849mm73in |
| Height | 1,511mm59in | 1,590mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,615mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,593mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 435L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,430L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Formentor VZ 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | 5,450-6,600 rpm | 2,000-5,450 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 6,100 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.1 s | 17.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 113 mph | 176 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | 310 hp 231 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 306 hp 228 kW |
Cupra Formentor VZ 2.0 TSI has 4 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35 and Cupra Formentor VZ 2.0 TSI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | 1,569 kg 3,459 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | 4.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor VZ 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | 198 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | 310 hp 231 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,569 kg 3,459 lb | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 554 km 344 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 198 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Formentor VZ 2.0 TSI
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 106 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























