Cupra Formentor
Car comparison
Cupra Formentor VZ 2.0 TSIvsCupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Terramar
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Formentor VZ 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,569 kg3,459 lb
- Best power-to-weight198 hp/t147 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score68/100
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,569kg3,459lb | 1,675kg3,693lb |
| Gross weight | 2,140kg4,718lb | 2,290kg5,049lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 55.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 67.1s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.1s Calculated | 22.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 198hp/t147kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 682km424mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,450mm175in | 4,519mm178in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,869mm74in |
| Height | 1,511mm59in | 1,586mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,681mm106in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 540L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Formentor VZ 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | 5,450-6,600 rpm | 2,000-5,450 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 1,650-4,350 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.1 s | 22.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | 310 hp 231 kW |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
Cupra Formentor VZ 2.0 TSI has 45 hp more than Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Cupra Formentor VZ 2.0 TSI: 45 hp (34 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | 1,569 kg 3,459 lb |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 243 km/h 151 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | 4.9 s |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor VZ 2.0 TSI and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | 198 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | 310 hp 231 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.9 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,569 kg 3,459 lb | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 682 km 424 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 198 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Formentor VZ 2.0 TSI
- Has 45 hp more
- Is 106 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























