Car comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDIvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY)

50 TDI

286 hp2967 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2020
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

P 300 2.0

300 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    237 km/h
    147 mph
  • Highest torque
    620 Nm
    457 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    162 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,066 km
    662 mi
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDILand RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
286hp213kW
300hp224kW
Torque
620Nm457lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,870kg4,123lb
1,813kg3,997lb
Gross weight
2,565kg5,655lb
-
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
67.1s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
72.3s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.0s
0-200 km/h
23.8s
Calculated
25.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
5.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
332Nm/t222lb-ft/ton
Calculated
221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,066km662mi
Calculated
808km502mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,967cc181cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,663mm184in
4,803mm189in
Width
1,893mm75in
-
Height
1,659mm65in
1,665mm66in
Wheelbase
2,819mm111in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,616mm64in
1,644mm65in
Rear track
1,609mm63in
1,663mm65in
Ground clearance-
251mm10in
Trunk volume
550L
673L
Max trunk volume-
1,731L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
63L
CO2 emissions
162g/km
178g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDILand Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0PowerTorque
  • AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm2,250-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.05,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDILand RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
5.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.8 s
25.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
11.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
164 km/h
102 mph
160 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
286 hp
213 kW
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
300 hp
224 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 has 14 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
1,870 kg
4,123 lb
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
1,813 kg
3,997 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
237 km/h
147 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
234 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI5.9 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.06.0 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 has more power, AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
1,066 km
662 mi
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
808 km
502 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
286 hp
213 kW
5.9 s
237 km/h
147 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
300 hp
224 kW
6.0 s
234 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
5.9 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
6.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDILand RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
286 hp
213 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.0 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
1,870 kg
4,123 lb
1,813 kg
3,997 lb
Fuel consumption
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
Range score
1,066 km
662 mi
808 km
502 mi
CO2 score
162 g/km
178 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDILand Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0
Consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.67 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.18 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used915 L242 US gal201 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,601 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI

  • Has 220 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 258 km (160 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 16 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Is 57 kg lighter
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 123 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

50 TDI
50 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6
P 300 2.0
2.0t
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
50 TDI
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6
P 300 2.0
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
50 TDI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6
P 300 2.0
2.0 P300
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
50 TDI
3.2 FSI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
P 300 2.0
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
50 TDI
50 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
P 300 2.0
3.0d
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
50 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDIvsAUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI
P 300 2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster