Car comparison

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300vsLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar E-Pace

2.0 P300

300 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2020
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

P 300 2.0

300 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.0 s
  • Lightest
    1,813 kg
    3,997 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    165 hp/t
    123 kW/t
    6.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    178 g/km
  • Best overall score
    70/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300

  • Fastest top speed
    243 km/h
    151 mph
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    856 km
    532 mi
  • Largest trunk
    1,234 L
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
300hp224kW
300hp224kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,894kg4,176lb
1,813kg3,997lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
-
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
85.2s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
72.3s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.4s
6.0s
0-200 km/h
26.4s
Calculated
25.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
5.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
856km532mi
Calculated
808km502mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,803mm189in
Width
1,984mm78in
-
Height
1,649mm65in
1,665mm66in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,635mm64in
1,644mm65in
Rear track
1,634mm64in
1,663mm65in
Ground clearance
204mm8in
251mm10in
Trunk volume
1,234L
673L
Max trunk volume
2,577L
1,731L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
69L
63L
CO2 emissions
181g/km
178g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0PowerTorque
  • Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P3005,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.05,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
5.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.4 s
6.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.4 s
25.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.2 s
11.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
160 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
300 hp
224 kW
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
300 hp
224 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
1,894 kg
4,176 lb
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
1,813 kg
3,997 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
243 km/h
151 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
234 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P3006.4 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.06.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
856 km
532 mi
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
808 km
502 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
300 hp
224 kW
6.4 s
243 km/h
151 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
300 hp
224 kW
6.0 s
234 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
6.4 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
6.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.4 s
6.0 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
1,894 kg
4,176 lb
1,813 kg
3,997 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
Range score
856 km
532 mi
808 km
502 mi
CO2 score
181 g/km
178 g/km
Trunk score
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300

  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 49 km (30 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 561 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0

  • Is 81 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 3 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 P300
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
P 300 2.0
2.0t
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
P 300 2.0
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
2.0 P300
3.0d
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
P 300 2.0
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2.0 P300
50 TDI V6
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
2.0 P300
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
P 300 2.0
50 TDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
P 300 2.0
2.0
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
P 300 2.0
2.0 TFSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsAUDISQ22.0 TFSI
2.0 P300
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 P300
40i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsBMWX7 (G07)40i
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster