Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0vsLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)

2.0

280 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

P 300 2.0

300 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,660 kg
    3,660 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    169 hp/t
    126 kW/t
    5.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.9 L/100 km
    26.4 mpg US
    31.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    161 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    914 km
    568 mi
  • Best performance score
    62/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
280hp209kW
300hp224kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,660kg3,660lb
1,813kg3,997lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
234 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
65.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
72.3s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.7s
6.0s
0-200 km/h
22.3s
Calculated
25.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.4s
Calculated
5.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.9s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
914km568mi
Calculated
808km502mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,687mm185in
4,803mm189in
Width
1,903mm75in
-
Height
1,671mm66in
1,665mm66in
Wheelbase
2,818mm111in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,613mm64in
1,644mm65in
Rear track
1,653mm65in
1,663mm65in
Ground clearance
200mm8in
251mm10in
Trunk volume
525L
673L
Max trunk volume-
1,731L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
64L
63L
CO2 emissions
161g/km
178g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0PowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.05,250 rpm2,250 rpm5,500 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.05,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.4 s
5.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.7 s
6.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.3 s
25.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
234 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.7 s
11.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.9 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
166 km/h
103 mph
160 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
280 hp
209 kW
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
300 hp
224 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 has 20 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
1,813 kg
3,997 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
234 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.05.7 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.06.0 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 has more power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
914 km
568 mi
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
808 km
502 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
280 hp
209 kW
5.7 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
300 hp
224 kW
6.0 s
234 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,671 mm
65.8 in
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
5.7 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
6.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.7 s
6.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
1,813 kg
3,997 lb
Fuel consumption
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,671 mm
65.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
Range score
914 km
568 mi
808 km
502 mi
CO2 score
161 g/km
178 g/km
Trunk score
525 L
18.5 cu ft
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0
Consumption7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.25 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.71 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,838 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0

  • Is 153 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 107 km (66 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 17 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 148 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0 Turbo
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo
P 300 2.0
2.0t
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
2.0
2.0 T4
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
P 300 2.0
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
2.0
3.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
P 300 2.0
2.0 P300
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
2.0
Veloce 54 kWh
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAlfa RomeoJuniorVeloce 54 kWh
P 300 2.0
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
P 300 2.0
3.0d
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
P 300 2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
2.0
50 TDI V6
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
2.0
3.0 V6
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsMaseratiLevante3.0 V6
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster