AUDI Q8 (4M)
Car comparison
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6vsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,103 km685 mi
- Largest trunk605 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions161 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,145kg4,729lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,890kg6,371lb | - |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 90.6s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 64.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.6s Calculated | 22.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 280Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,103km685mi Calculated | 914km568mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,986mm196in | 4,687mm185in |
| Width | 1,995mm79in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,671mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,679mm66in | 1,613mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,691mm67in | 1,653mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 254mm10in | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 605L | 525L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,755L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 178g/km | 161g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 2,250-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 5,250 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.6 s | 22.3 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 286 hp 213 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 has 6 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 2,145 kg 4,729 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 6.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 5.7 s |
Although AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 has more power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 1,103 km 685 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 914 km 568 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.3 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,145 kg 4,729 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,103 km 685 mi | 914 km 568 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 178 g/km | 161 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 189 km (117 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Is 485 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























