Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0vsJaguar F-Pace 2.0t

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)

2.0

280 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Jaguar F-Pace

2.0t

300 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,660 kg
    3,660 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    161 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    914 km
    568 mi
  • Largest trunk
    525 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    62/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0JaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
280hp209kW
300hp224kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,660kg3,660lb
1,770kg3,902lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
233 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
64.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
70.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.7s
6.0s
0-200 km/h
22.3s
Calculated
25.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.4s
Calculated
5.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.9s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
914km568mi
Calculated
818km508mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,687mm185in
4,746mm187in
Width
1,903mm75in
2,070mm81in
Height
1,671mm66in
1,667mm66in
Wheelbase
2,818mm111in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,613mm64in
1,641mm65in
Rear track
1,653mm65in
1,654mm65in
Ground clearance
200mm8in
213mm8in
Trunk volume
525L
463L
Max trunk volume-
650L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
64L
63L
CO2 emissions
161g/km
174g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0Jaguar F-Pace 2.0tPowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.05,250 rpm2,250 rpm5,500 rpm
JaguarF-Pace2.0t5,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0JaguarF-Pace2.0t
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.4 s
5.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.7 s
6.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.3 s
25.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
233 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.7 s
11.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.9 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
166 km/h
103 mph
161 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
280 hp
209 kW
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
300 hp
224 kW

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t has 20 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
1,770 kg
3,902 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
233 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.05.7 s
JaguarF-Pace2.0t6.0 s

Although Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t has more power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
914 km
568 mi
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
818 km
508 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
280 hp
209 kW
5.7 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
300 hp
224 kW
6.0 s
233 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,671 mm
65.8 in
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,746 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,667 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
5.7 s
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
6.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0JaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
280 hp
209 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.7 s
6.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
Fuel consumption
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,671 mm
65.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,746 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,667 mm
65.6 in
Range score
914 km
568 mi
818 km
508 mi
CO2 score
161 g/km
174 g/km
Trunk score
525 L
18.5 cu ft
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t
Consumption7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.25 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.71 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,838 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0

  • Is 110 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 96 km (60 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 62 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 13 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0 Turbo
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo
2.0t
3.0d
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0tvsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
2.0
2.0 T4
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
2.0t
2.0 P300
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0tvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
2.0
3.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
2.0t
2.0i
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0tvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0
Veloce 54 kWh
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAlfa RomeoJuniorVeloce 54 kWh
2.0t
2.0 T6
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0tvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
2.0
3.0d V6
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsJaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
2.0t
2.0 T6
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0tvsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2.0
50 TDI V6
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
2.0t
35i
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0tvsBMWX6 (F16)35i
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t - car comparison - FastVsFaster