Jaguar F-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6vsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions159 g/km
- Best estimated range1,100 km684 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,884kg4,154lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,570kg5,666lb | - |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 78.8s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 64.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.5s Calculated | 22.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,100km684mi Calculated | 914km568mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,731mm186in | 4,687mm185in |
| Width | 2,070mm81in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,671mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,641mm65in | 1,613mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,654mm65in | 1,653mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 650L | 525L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 159g/km | 161g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 5,250 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.5 s | 22.3 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 has 20 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 1,884 kg 4,154 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 6.2 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 5.7 s |
Although Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 has more power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 1,100 km 684 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 914 km 568 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.2 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,884 kg 4,154 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,100 km 684 mi | 914 km 568 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 159 g/km | 161 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 300 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 186 km (115 mi) more estimated range
- Has 125 L more trunk volume
- Emits 2 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Is 224 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























